Guerrillas and Civilian Participation: The National Resistance Army in Uganda, 1981-86
Guerrillas and Civilian Participation: The National Resistance Army in Uganda, 1981-86
复制标题
游击队和平民参与：乌干达民族抵抗军，1981-86 年
DOI：
10.1017/s0022278x05000832
复制
发表时间：
2005
影响因子：
0.8
通讯作者：
Nelson Kasfir
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Nelson Kasfir
游击队组织与生活在他们控制的领土上的平民的关系差异很大。全国步枪协会提供了一个罕见但并非独一无二的游击队案例，该组织在内战期间加深了对民众支持的承诺，并深化了民主村庄管理。加深这一承诺的重要因素是其意识形态信念、相对军事实力、对民用物资援助的依赖以及在其作战地区适应平民偏好的需要。它在面临严峻的军事压力时撤回了这一承诺。军事生存是全国步枪协会计算的核心，但不足以确定其与平民的关系。在战争的那些阶段，全国步枪协会士兵相对安全，这些其他因素决定了它支持的平民参与类型。当它依赖于平民时，它组织秘密平民委员会寻求援助。在它占领领土的那些时期，它举行了一些委员会的选举，这些委员会在没有全国步枪协会监督的情况下管理其村庄。
Guerrilla organisations vary greatly in their relations with civilians living in territories that they control. The NRA presents a rare, though not unique, case of a guerrilla group whose commitment to popular support deepened into democratic village management during the course of its civil war. The significant causal factors in deepening this commitment were its ideological conviction, relative military strength, dependence on civilian material assistance, and need for accommodation with civilian preferences in its operational area. It withdrew this commitment when it was under severe military pressure. Military survival was central to NRA calculations, but insufficient to determine its relations to civilians. In those phases of the war when the NRA soldiers were relatively secure, these other factors determined the type of civilian participation it supported. It organised clandestine civilian committees for assistance when it was dependent on civilians. During those periods when it held territory, it held elections for committees which managed their villages without NRA supervision.