Is Labor Market Mismatch a Big Deal in Japan?

Is Labor Market Mismatch a Big Deal in Japan?
复制标题

劳动力市场不匹配在日本是一个大问题吗?

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2013
期刊:
The B.E. Journals in Macroeconomics
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Ippei Shibata
Ippei Shibata
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Ippei Shibata

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

摘要本文利用Sahin等人的方法对2000年至2019年日本劳动力市场错配进行了估计。(“错配失业。”《美国经济评论》104期(11期):3529期--,2014年。我们量化了合同类型(正规或非正规)、就业类型(全职或兼职)和职业错配以及它们各自对失业率变化的贡献。这三种类型的错配都呈现出反周期的模式,在全球金融危机(GFC)期间急剧增加,但在复苏期间缓慢下降。在GFC期间,合同类型和职业不匹配是失业率上升的重要原因,分别约占30%和20%-40%。另一方面,就业类型的不匹配所占比例要小得多--约占同期失业率上升的15%。
Abstract This paper estimates Japanese labor market mismatch between 2000 and 2019 by using the method of Sahin et al. (“Mismatch Unemployment.” The American Economic Review 104 (11): 3529–64, 2014). We quantify contract-type (regular or non-regular), employment-type (full or part-time), and occupational mismatch and their respective contributions to changes in unemployment. All three types of mismatch show a countercyclical pattern, sharply increasing during the global financial crisis (GFC), but slowly declining during the recovery. Contract-type and occupational mismatch accounted for a significant portion of the rise in the unemployment rate during the GFC, each accounting for around 30 and 20–40 percent, respectively. Employment-type mismatch, on the other hand, accounted for much less–at around 15 perecent of the rise in unemployment for the same period.
DOI: 10.1016/j.red.2012.07.001
发表时间: 2013-07
影响因子: 2
作者:
Daniel Borowczyk-Martins;Grégory Jolivet;F. Postel-Vinay
通讯作者: Daniel Borowczyk-Martins;Grégory Jolivet;F. Postel-Vinay