Coupled Arenas: Why state-building is so difficult
Coupled Arenas: Why state-building is so difficult
复制标题
耦合竞技场:为什么国家建设如此困难
DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2007
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Alex Veit
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Klaus Schlichte;Alex Veit
Interventions seem to regularly result in unintended outcomes that no one has planned or anticipated. Many of these outcomes can be associated with organizational problems and connected ways of perceiving reality within the interventionists’ camps. These processes of knowledge production and implementation will be explained by the model of “coupled arenas”. Interactions between different arenas lead to a contradictory indirect administration of the Global South. Most of the problems of interventions aiming at “state-building” can be better understood when conceived as results of the interactions between actors in three different arenas, namely Western headquarters, national base camps, and local offices “in the bush”. Normally, NGOs and international agencies, likewise, are facing problems stemming from the fact that their activities take place in different places simultaneously. While in the Western headquarter bureaucratic logics and moral politics prevail, the national base camp obeys to the logic of intermediary rule. Finally, in the bush office, decisions and plans taken elsewhere face the logic of social contexts which follow often entirely different patterns of organization. Instead of only blaming the target societies and “corrupt officials” as so many studies on the problems of “state-building” do, we want to redirect scholarly attention to the built-in organizational problems interventions create by themselves.