Researchers say changes needed in recruitment policies for NIH trials.
Researchers say changes needed in recruitment policies for NIH trials.
复制标题
研究人员表示,美国国立卫生研究院试验的招募政策需要改变。
DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2003
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
B. Vastag
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
B. Vastag
Toxicity studies involving pesticides and humans were accepted by the EPA until 1998 when the agency imposed the moratorium, citing scientific and ethical concerns that began emerging in the 1980s. The action, along with passage of the Food Quality Protection Act of 1996 (which reduced allowable pesticide levels in children by yet another variable uncertainty factor) prompted pesticide manufacturers to file a lawsuit against the EPA to force the agency to lift the moratorium. Oral arguments in that suit are scheduled to begin in March. While the legal process unfolds, the NAS committee’s work continues. Harold Vanderpool, PhD, a research ethicist with the Institute for the Medical Humanities, University of Texas Medical Branch in Galveston questions whether the NAS can find ethical justification for human toxicity testing that would be sufficient to lift the EPA moratorium. “One criterion for human research has to be a balance of benefits and harms,” said Vanderpool. “Also, there is a duty to do good and a duty not to do harm. The duty not to do harm is a more stringent requirement, and I’m not sure this toxicity testing can be defended.” The NAS committee is expected to release its recommendations in December. The EPA, working under no mandated deadline, will then consider the group’s advice and make a decision whether to include human toxicity studies into the chemical approval process.