Disintegrated Rural Development? Neo‐endogenous Rural Development, Planning and Place‐Shaping in Diffused Power Contexts
Disintegrated Rural Development? Neo‐endogenous Rural Development, Planning and Place‐Shaping in Diffused Power Contexts
复制标题
分散权力背景下的新内生农村发展、规划与场所塑造
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2010
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
M. Shucksmith
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
M. Shucksmith
国家在促进可持续农村社区方面的作用是什么？仅在几年前，对这一问题的任何讨论都会提到农村综合发展的概念。今天，治理的概念在国际上被用来解决这些问题，反映了对国家（各级）不断变化的作用的认识，以及公共，私人和志愿部门在分散的权力背景下在多个尺度上互动的更大倾向，以及试图动员当地行为者。本文问的概念，农村综合发展，是否仍然有任何意义的背景下，新的农村治理，并开始将此链接到空间规划，地方塑造，能力建设和新的内生发展的概念的重新理论化，并提供了苏格兰北部的例证。文章最后建议，倡议，如欧盟的LEADER计划可能会被明确地作为一个跨国实验，在做“解体的农村发展”，解决新内生的农村发展，多标量治理，一个有利的，生成的国家和主流政策的转变的挑战。
What is the role of the state in promoting sustainable rural communities? Only a few years ago any discussion of this question would have alluded to the concept of integrated rural development. Today the concept of governance is internationally used to address such questions, reflecting a recognition of the changing role of the state (at all levels) and the greater propensity for public, private and voluntary sectors to interact at multiple scales in diffused power contexts together with attempts to mobilise local actors. This article asks whether the concept, integrated rural development, still has any meaning in the context of the new rural governance and begins to link this to re-theorisations of concepts of spatial planning, place-shaping, capacity-building and neo-endogenous development, and offers illustrations from the north of Scotland. The article concludes by suggesting that initiatives such as the EU’s LEADER programme might be recast explicitly as a transnational experiment in doing ‘disintegrated rural development’, addressing the challenges of neo-endogenous rural development, multi-scalar governance, an enabling, generative state and the transformation of mainstream policies.