Expanded confidence intervals, one-sided tests, and equivalence testing.

Expanded confidence intervals, one-sided tests, and equivalence testing.
复制标题

扩大的置信区间、单方面检验和等价性检验。

DOI:
10.1080/10543409208835038
复制
发表时间:
1992
影响因子:
1.1
通讯作者:
Eve Bofinger
Eve Bofinger
中科院分区:
医学4区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Eve Bofinger

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

一个参数,扩展的置信区间的基础上,总是执行单侧检验。但是,如果目标不是单侧的,并且需要“后续”推断,则通常的双侧置信区间(对应于双侧检验)通常是合适的。当需要进行等效性检验时(目的是显示治疗“没有太大差异”),扩展置信区间比韦斯特莱克的对称置信区间更有效。
An argument, based on expanded confidence intervals, is given for always performing one-sided tests. However, if goals are not one-sided and "follow-up" inferences are required, then the usual two-sided confidence intervals (corresponding to two-sided tests) are generally appropriate. When equivalence testing is required (the goal being to show that treatments are "not too different"), expanded confidence intervals are more efficient than Westlake's symmetrical confidence intervals.