Psychometric examination of short forms from the University of Washington pain-related self-efficacy and concerns about pain item banks in patients with low back pain.
Psychometric examination of short forms from the University of Washington pain-related self-efficacy and concerns about pain item banks in patients with low back pain.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1007/s11136-021-02923-0
复制
发表时间：
2022-02
影响因子：
3.5
通讯作者：
Amtmann, Dagmar
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Fritz, Julie M.;Alodaibi, Faris;Bamer, Alyssa M.;Amtmann, Dagmar
目的本研究检查了评估与疼痛相关的自我效能和灾难化的定制简短形式的心理测量特性，这对于患有疼痛的个体来说是重要的心理社会结构。简短表格源自华盛顿大学对疼痛的关注 (UWCAP) 和疼痛相关自我效能 (UWPRSE) 项目库。方法在检查非药物治疗的临床试验 (n= 241) 中，患有腰痛 (LBP) 的参与者完成了 8 项 UWCAP 和 9 项 UWPRSE 以及数字疼痛强度评级、Oswestry 残疾和恐惧回避信念问卷。注册后 1、4 和 12 周。 Cronbach 的 alpha 和组内相关系数分别估计内部一致性和重测可靠性。研究了 UWCAP 和 UWPRSE 的下限和上限效应。使用单变量相关系数评估同时有效性，并使用多元回归模型评估预测有效性。根据单项全局评级指标将参与者分为治疗反应性类别，并计算每个类别的 UWPRSE 和 UWCAP 变化分数和标准化效应大小。结果两种简表都具有良好的内部一致性（α = 0.89–0.90）和重测可靠性（ICC = 0.77–0.85），没有显着的下限或上限效应。正如预期的那样，UWCAP 与疼痛强度、残疾和恐惧回避信念的同时测量呈正相关，而 UWPRSE 呈负相关。 UWCAP 添加了 4 周残疾结果的预测模型 (β = 0.25，p= 0.008)。治疗反应类别的平均变化分数和效应大小支持反应性。结论 UWCAP 和 UWPRSE 简表表现出可接受的心理测量特性，支持未来研究这些结构在 LBP 患者管理中的作用。试验注册：ClinicalTrials.gov ID：NCT02860834。 2016年8月16日注册
PurposeThis study examined the psychometric properties of custom short forms assessing pain-related self-efficacy and catastrophizing, which are important psychosocial constructs for individuals with pain conditions. Short forms were derived from the University of Washington concerns about pain (UWCAP) and pain-related self-efficacy (UWPRSE) item banks.MethodsParticipants with low back pain (LBP) in a clinical trial (n= 241) examining nonpharmacologic treatments completed the 8-item UWCAP and 9-item UWPRSE and a numeric pain intensity rating, Oswestry Disability and Fear-Avoidance Beliefs questionnaires at baseline, 1-, 4- and 12-weeks after enrollment. Cronbach’s alpha and intraclass correlation coefficients estimated internal consistency and test–retest reliability, respectively. Floor and ceiling effects for the UWCAP and UWPRSE were examined. Concurrent validity was evaluated with univariate correlation coefficients and predictive validity with multivariate regression models. Participants were divided into categories of treatment responsiveness based on a single-item global rating measure, and UWPRSE and UWCAP change scores and standardized effect sizes were calculated in each category.ResultsBoth short forms had good internal consistency (α = 0.89–0.90) and test–retest reliability (ICC = 0.77–0.85), without substantial floor or ceiling effects. As expected, the UWCAP was positively correlated, and UWPRSE negatively correlated, with concurrent measures of pain intensity, disability and fear-avoidance beliefs. The UWCAP added to the prediction model for 4-week disability outcomes (β = 0.25,p= 0.008). Responsiveness was supported by the mean change scores and effect sizes across treatment response categories.ConclusionThe UWCAP and UWPRSE short forms demonstrated acceptable psychometric properties, supporting future research on the role of these constructs in the management of persons with LBP. Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT02860834. Registered on August 16, 2016
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
3.7
作者：
Cheng ST;Leung CMC;Chan KL;Chen PP;Chow YF;Chung JWY;Law ACB;Lee JSW;Leung EMF;Tam CWC
通讯作者：
Tam CWC
影响因子：
2.5
作者：
Fritz, Julie M.;Sharpe, Jason A.;Kawchuk, Gregory
通讯作者：
Kawchuk, Gregory
影响因子：
3.1
作者：
Darnall, Beth D.;Ziadni, Maisa S.;Wheeler, Amanda
通讯作者：
Wheeler, Amanda
影响因子：
3
作者：
KAZIS, LE;ANDERSON, JJ;MEENAN, RF
通讯作者：
MEENAN, RF
影响因子：
3.2
作者：
Fritz, JM;Irrgang, JJ
通讯作者：
Irrgang, JJ