Validation of the Mandarin Version of the Vocabulary Size Test
Validation of the Mandarin Version of the Vocabulary Size Test
复制标题
词汇量测试普通话版本的验证
DOI：
10.1177/0033688216639761
复制
发表时间：
2018
期刊：
影响因子：
3
通讯作者：
Xiaoli Ji
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Ping Zhao;Xiaoli Ji
本文从Messick（1995）建构效度框架的内容层面、技术质量层面、实体性层面和概括性层面，为汉语词汇量测试（VST）简体版提供初步的效度证据。短句来源以177名中国大学生为测试对象，从经典测试理论和项目反应理论的角度来看，该测试具有较高的效度。单因素方差分析和Rasch分析的详细统计表明，该测试可以有效区分不同水平的学习者。VST的前8个级别总体上呈现出一个上升的难度连续体，但第7和第8个级别的一些外来词在准确评估汉语学习者的词汇量方面存在问题。构念效度的普遍性表现在同一熟练程度组的学习者在性别方面不存在项目偏倚。与其他单语或双语版本的研究结果相比，本研究试图证明普通话版本的适当性，并呼吁在中国学习者中谨慎使用测试工具。
This article provides preliminary validity evidence for the shorter Mandarin version of the Vocabulary Size Test (VST) under the content aspect, technical quality, substantive and generalizability aspect of Messick’s (1995) construct validity framework. The shorter version with 177 Chinese university students in three proficiency levels indicates that the test enjoys a high level of validity both from the perspective of classical test theory and item response theory. A one-way ANOVA and detailed statistics of Rasch analyses demonstrate that the test could effectively distinguish learners from different proficiency levels. The first eight levels of the VST generally display an ascending difficulty continuum except that some loan words in the seventh and the eighth level prove to be problematic in assessing Chinese learners’ vocabulary size accurately. The generalizability aspect of construct validity is demonstrated in that there is no item bias for learners of the same proficiency group in terms of gender. Compared with the results of other studies either on monolingual or bilingual version, this research attempts to justify the appropriateness of the Mandarin version and calls for cautious applications of the test instrument on Chinese learners.
通过 45 T 差热分析得出 MnBi 在强磁场中的平衡状态
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2010
期刊：
影响因子：
--
作者：
三井好古;et al
通讯作者：
et al