Clinical utility of 18F-FDG PET for patients with salivary gland malignancies.

Clinical utility of 18F-FDG PET for patients with salivary gland malignancies.
复制标题

18F-FDG PET 对唾液腺恶性肿瘤患者的临床应用。

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2007
影响因子:
9.3
通讯作者:
S. Kim
S. Kim
中科院分区:
医学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
J. Roh;C. Ryu;S. Choi;Jae Seung Kim;Jeong Hyun Lee;Kyung;S. Nam;S. Kim

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

无标签 18F-FDG PET 在评估唾液腺恶性肿瘤中的临床效用尚未明确。因此,我们评估了 18F-FDG PET 在唾液腺癌患者治疗中的效用。 方法 34 名新诊断唾液腺癌患者在手术切除并放疗之前接受了 CT 和 18F-FDG PET 检查。将 CT 和 18F-FDG PET 检测原发肿瘤和颈部转移的诊断准确性与组织病理学参考进行比较。我们确定了肿瘤的最大标准化摄取值(SUV)与临床病理参数(如性别、年龄、局部肿瘤侵犯、T和N类别、TNM分期和组织学分级)之间的关系,以及它们与无病生存(DFS)的关系。 结果 18F-FDG PET 对初次分期的 2 例患者的原发肿瘤(91.2% vs. 79.4%;P < 0.05)、颈部转移(80.5% vs. 56.1%;P < 0.05)和远处转移的检测比 CT 更敏感。高级别恶性肿瘤的平均最大 SUV 高于低级别和中级别恶性肿瘤(4.6 vs. 2.8;P = 0.011)。 T 和 N 类别是 DFS 的独立决定因素 (P < 0.05),但最大 SUV (4.0) 不是。在平均 25.1 个月的随访期间,18F-FDG PET 正确诊断了 6 名患者的局部区域复发和 9 名患者的新远处转移。 结论 我们的研究结果表明,对于唾液腺恶性肿瘤患者,18F-FDG PET 在临床上可用于初始分期、组织学分级和治疗后监测,但不能用于预测患者生存。
UNLABELLED The clinical utility of 18F-FDG PET in evaluating salivary gland malignancies has not been well defined. We therefore evaluated the utility of 18F-FDG PET in management for patients with salivary gland cancers. METHODS Thirty-four patients with newly diagnosed salivary gland cancers underwent CT and 18F-FDG PET before surgical resection with radiotherapy. The diagnostic accuracies of CT and 18F-FDG PET for detecting primary tumors and neck metastases were compared with a histopathologic reference. We determined the relationship between the maximum standardized uptake value (SUV) of the tumor and clinicopathologic parameters such as sex, age, local tumor invasion, T and N categories, TNM stage, and histologic grade, as well as their associations with disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS 18F-FDG PET was more sensitive than CT for the detection of primary tumors (91.2% vs. 79.4%; P < 0.05), cervical metastases (80.5% vs. 56.1%; P < 0.05), and distant metastases in 2 patients at initial staging. High-grade malignancies had higher mean maximum SUVs than did low- and intermediate-grade malignancies (4.6 vs. 2.8; P = 0.011). T and N categories were independent determinants of DFS (P < 0.05), but the maximum SUV (4.0) was not. During a mean follow-up of 25.1 mo, 18F-FDG PET correctly diagnosed local-regional recurrences in 6 patients and new distant metastases in 9 patients. CONCLUSION Our findings indicate that, in patients with salivary gland malignancies, 18F-FDG PET is clinically useful in initial staging, histologic grading, and monitoring after treatment but not in predicting patient survival.
DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.106596
发表时间: 2023-02-09
影响因子: 7.7
作者:
Wahid,Muqeet;Saqib,Fatima;Gandara,Jesus Simal
通讯作者: Gandara,Jesus Simal