Assessment and Action Records: Will they Promote Good Parenting?
Assessment and Action Records: Will they Promote Good Parenting?
复制标题
评估和行动记录：它们会促进良好的养育吗？
DOI：
10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjsw.a011315
复制
发表时间：
1998
影响因子：
1.8
通讯作者：
S. Caveney
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
T. Knight;S. Caveney
在这篇文章中，作者试图对《照顾儿童：良好的养育和良好的结果》（卫生部，1995年）提供一个批判性的看法。他们欢迎支持这一重大贡献的情绪，其中认识到由地方当局照顾的儿童和青年面临许多不利条件，并承认地方当局并不是他们所照顾的儿童和青年的积极父母。作者还承认，上述文件包中所载的行动和评估记录已经深入到细节中。受到质疑的是被视为这些文件核心的养育子女和家庭生活的规范性观点，以及缺乏对行动计划资源的考虑。清单方法因其将加强公共护理的官僚性质而受到批评，这反过来又影响了父母和儿童相对于地方当局的权力地位，并将影响伙伴关系护理模式的发展。作者得出结论，儿童和青少年在照顾只是一个群体的年轻人面临不利和剥夺在英国社会。对他们的困境以及如何解决这一问题的审查，必须建立在儿童权利的明确框架内，并承认成年人对他们拥有的权力。
In this article the authors seek to provide a critical look at Looking After children: Good Parenting and Good Outcomes (Department of Health, 1995). They welcome the sentiments underpinning this major contribution, which recognizes the many disadvantages faced by children and young people who are looked after by local authorities, and acknowledge that local authorities have not been positive parents of those in their care. The writers also acknowledge the thoroughness which has gone into the detail of the Action and Assessment Records contained in the above pack. What is questioned is the normative view of parenting and family life which is seen to be at the heart of these documents and the lack of consideration of the resourcing of action plans. The checklist approach is criticized for the way in which it will enhance the bureaucratic nature of being in public care, which in tum affects the relative power positions of parents and children in relation to the local authority and which will impact on the development of a partnership model of care. The writers conclude that children and young people in care are but one group of young people facing disadvantage and deprivation in British society. An examination of their plight and how to address it need to be based within a clear framework of children's rights and a recognition of the power adults hold over them.