Expression of subtype-specific group 1 leiomyosarcoma markers in a wide variety of sarcomas by gene expression analysis and immunohistochemistry.
Expression of subtype-specific group 1 leiomyosarcoma markers in a wide variety of sarcomas by gene expression analysis and immunohistochemistry.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1097/pas.0b013e318211abd6
复制
发表时间:
2011-04
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
West RB
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Mills AM;Beck AH;Montgomery KD;Zhu SX;Espinosa I;Lee CH;Subramanian S;Fletcher CD;van de Rijn M;West RB
Leiomyosarcomas (LMS) constitute approximately one quarter of all sarcomas and are usually defined by morphologic criteria and/or immunoreactivity for actin or desmin. Among high grade lesions, the distinction from undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS) can be problematic and previous studies have shown that a significant number of LMS cases may be “hiding” under the diagnosis of UPS. We recently described 3 novel molecular LMS subtypes that are distributed similarly over LMS of GYN and non-GYN origin. The Group 1 subtype shows an improved disease-specific survival compared to the other 2 groups that is independent of histologic grade. Group 1 comprises ~25% of all LMS and is defined by a shared pattern of gene expression, a distinct pattern of genomic changes, and reactivity for at least 3 of 5 immunohistochemistry (IHC) markers (ACTG2, CASQ2, CFL2, MYLK, SLMAP) as tested on 271 cases of LMS in TMAs. These IHC markers have not been well characterized in non-LMS sarcomas. Here we provide a characterization of these 5 markers across normal tissues, an additional 59 cases of LMS, and a wide range of 565 non-LMS soft tissue tumors from 44 diagnostic categories with a focus on UPS. When analyzed individually, the 5 markers were found to be expressed in many sarcomas other than LMS. However, when analyzed by the same criteria used for the recognition of Group 1 LMS where a case is scored positive when at least 3 of 5 markers reacted, coordinate expression was seen in significant numbers of cases from only three diagnostic groups that included 22% of leiomyomas (n=22), 16% of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (n=43), and 18% of endometrial stromal sarcoma (n=11). In addition, 5% (n=57) of UPS showed a staining pattern similar to that seen in Group 1 LMS. To further examine the possibility that Group 1 LMS constitutes a small part of cases diagnosed as UPS, we examined the expression of the top 500 genes from the Group 1 LMS expression signature in 29 UPS by cDNA microarray. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering of the 29 UPS expression revealed that 2 (7%) had coordinated high levels of expression of genes from the Group 1 LMS signature, a rate similar to that seen by IHC analysis. These findings show that Group 1 LMS IHC markers ACTG2, CASQ2, CFL2, MYLK, and SLMAP when coordinately expressed have specificity for a subset of LMS when compared to other sarcomas and may be useful for the recognition of Group 1 LMS cases within cases diagnosed as UPS.