Four Myths about the Digital Divide
Four Myths about the Digital Divide
复制标题
关于数字鸿沟的四个误区
DOI：
10.1080/14649350220150080
复制
发表时间：
2002
影响因子：
3.9
通讯作者：
Lisa J. Servon
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Lisa J. Servon
“地点”，进而突出规划实践面临的问题和选择。所有贡献者都利用来自各种环境的示例来说明他们的讨论。 Servon 首先概述了围绕数字技术传播的神话，特别是她在美国的经历。汉普顿的文章进一步探讨了基于计算机的技术在创建或破坏基于地点的社区中的作用，该文章特别关注美国内特维尔的案例研究。相比之下，达比内特结合英国实践的有用例证，探讨了信息通信技术对区域经济规划的影响。格雷厄姆还主要以英国为背景来考察中央电视台的迅速而广泛的使用。格雷厄姆和达比内特都向从业者和政策制定者发出有益的警告，不要幼稚，特别是关于技术的排他性和分裂性潜力。最后，Kopomaa 利用他在芬兰的经验来探讨移动电话的广泛普及如何影响对社区价值及其与特定地点的关系的理解。所有后续评论均代表作者的个人观点，而不是他们工作的组织的观点。
`place’ and in turn highlight issues and choices confronting planning practice. All the contributors draw on examples from a range of environments to illustrate their discussion. Servon starts by providing an overview of the myths surrounding the diffusion of digital technologies drawing in particular on her experience in the USA. The role of computer-based technologies in creating or destroying place-based community is further examined in Hampton’s article which focuses particular attention on the case study of Netville, USA. In contrast, Dabinett explores the implications of ICTs for regional economic planning incorporating useful illustrations from practice in Great Britain. Graham also largely takes Britain as the context in which he examines the rapid and extensive take-up of CCTV. Both Graham and Dabinett issue salutary warnings to practitioners and policy makers not to be naõ È ve, particularly about the exclusionary and divisive potential of technologies. Finally, Kopomaa utilizes his experience from Finland to explore how the widespread diffusion of mobile phones has in ̄ uenced understanding of the value of community and its relationship to speci® c places. All the subsequent comments represent the personal views of the authors and not the organizations for which they work.