Research Funding of the Top Science Gaps in the American Heart Association Cardiac Arrest Guidelines.
Research Funding of the Top Science Gaps in the American Heart Association Cardiac Arrest Guidelines.
复制标题
美国心脏协会心脏骤停指南中顶尖科学差距的研究资助。
DOI:
10.1161/circoutcomes.120.007627
复制
发表时间:
2021
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Kurz,MichaelC
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Coute,RyanA;Panchal,AshishR;Mader,TimothyJ;Kurz,MichaelC
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2021; 14: e007627. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES. 120.007627 May 2021 657 abstract, and the knowledge gap definition/rationale published by Panchal et al. 6 This analysis utilized publicly available grant information and, therefore, did not require institutional review board approval. The data are available to any researcher for the purposes of reproducing the results.The search yielded 1518 NIH-funded grants, of which 172 (11.3%) were classified as individual CA grants. A total of 42 (24.4%) did not address a top 10 scientific gap. The remaining 130 grants addressed the following scientific gaps: optimization of post-CA care (78 grants; 45.3%), prediction of patients at risk of CA (12; 7%), developing tools for early neuroprognostication (7; 4.1%), hemodynamic monitoring/goal-directed resuscitation (4; 2.3%), optimizing educational strategies for providers (4; 2.3%), optimal airway strategies (2; 1.2%), and understanding why bystanders fail to respond (1; 0.6%). Previously existing scientific networks or data centers accounted for 19 (11%) grants, and 3 (1.7%) grants addressed> 1 science gap. Recognized scientific gaps in dispatchdirected cardiopulmonary resuscitation, individualized resuscitation strategies, and novel technology for outof-hospital CA identification and response did not receive specifically directed NIH grant funding. Annual funding increased from $40.1 M to $42.1 M over the study period.