Feasibility of replacing the ICD-10-CM with the ICD-11 for morbidity coding: A content analysis

Feasibility of replacing the ICD-10-CM with the ICD-11 for morbidity coding: A content analysis
复制标题

DOI:
10.1093/jamia/ocab156
复制
发表时间:
2021-08-12
影响因子:
6.4
通讯作者:
Bodenreider, Olivier
Bodenreider, Olivier
中科院分区:
管理学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Fung, Kin Wah;Xu, Julia;Bodenreider, Olivier

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

目的:该研究旨在评估的可行性,取代国际疾病分类第10次修订,临床修改(ICD-10-CM)与国际疾病分类第11次修订(ICD-11)的发病率编码的基础上的内容analysis.Materials和方法:最常用的ICD-10-CM代码从每一章,涵盖60%的患者被确定为医疗保险索赔和医院的数据。每个ICD-10-CM代码在ICD-11中重新编码,必要时使用后协调(代码组合)。重新编码由2名术语学家独立进行。失败的情况下,即使与postcoordination没有达到充分的代表性进行了分析。重新编码后,ICD-10-CM和ICD-11代码的编码指南(包括,排除,和索引)进行了审查的conflict.Results:总体而言,23.5%的943代码可以完全由ICD-11没有postcoordination代表。后协调是潜在的游戏规则改变者。它支持943个代码的8.6%的完整表示。此外,仅增加9个扩展代码,后协调支持943个代码的35.2%的完全表示。编码指南审查发现10%的代码存在潜在冲突,但大多数不影响重新编码。大多数的冲突是由于ICD-11和ICD-10-CM之间的粒度和默认编码假设的差异造成的。结论:随着一些轻微的增强后协调,ICD-11可以完全代表几乎60%的最常用的ICD-10-CM代码。即使没有后协调,23.5%的完全代表性与ICD-10-CM中完全匹配的ICD-9-CM代码的24.3%相当,因此从ICD-10-CM迁移到ICD-11并不一定比从国际疾病分类-第九版-临床修改到ICD-10-CM更具破坏性。因此,ICD-11(无CM)应被视为替代ICD-10-CM进行发病率编码的候选标准。
Objective: The study sought to assess the feasibility of replacing the International Classification of Diseases-Tenth Revision-Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) with the International Classification of Diseases-11th Revision (ICD-11) for morbidity coding based on content analysis.Materials and Methods: The most frequently used ICD-10-CM codes from each chapter covering 60% of patients were identified from Medicare claims and hospital data. Each ICD-10-CM code was recoded in the ICD-11, using postcoordination (combination of codes) if necessary. Recoding was performed by 2 terminologists independently. Failure analysis was done for cases where full representation was not achieved even with postcoordination. After recoding, the coding guidance (inclusions, exclusions, and index) of the ICD-10-CM and ICD-11 codes were reviewed for conflict.Results: Overall, 23.5% of 943 codes could be fully represented by the ICD-11 without postcoordination. Postcoordination is the potential game changer. It supports the full representation of 8.6% of 943 codes. Moreover, with the addition of only 9 extension codes, postcoordination supports the full representation of 35.2% of 943 codes. Coding guidance review identified potential conflicts in 10% of codes, but mostly not affecting recoding. The majority of the conflicts resulted from differences in granularity and default coding assumptions between the ICD-11 and ICD-10-CM.Conclusions: With some minor enhancements to postcoordination, the ICD-11 can fully represent almost 60% of the most frequently used ICD-10-CM codes. Even without postcoordination, 23.5% full representation is comparable to the 24.3% of ICD-9-CM codes with exact match in the ICD-10-CM, so migrating from the ICD-10-CM to the ICD-11 is not necessarily more disruptive than from the International Classification of Diseases-Ninth Revision-Clinical Modification to the ICD-10-CM. Therefore, the ICD-11 (without a CM) should be considered as a candidate to replace the ICD-10-CM for morbidity coding.