A Comparative Study of Baremetal Provisioning Frameworks

A Comparative Study of Baremetal Provisioning Frameworks
复制标题

裸机配置框架的比较研究

DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2015
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Garth A. Gibson
Garth A. Gibson
中科院分区：
--
文献类型：
--
作者：
A. Chandrasekar;Garth A. Gibson

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

现在市场上有很多裸金属骨架。这些裸机框架可自动将操作系统和其他软件部署到数据中心的各个机器上，从而帮助简化群集/数据中心管理员的工作。这些框架在价格、稳定性、可维护性、功能支持和性能等方面各不相同。因此，很难选择适合自己需要的最佳框架。本研究旨在帮助管理员根据自己的需求选择合适的框架，方法是对这些框架进行比较，重点是Emulab和OpenStack Ironic。致谢：本材料由美国国家科学基金会颁发的CNS-1042537和CNS-1042543(PROBE)奖部分支持，英特尔作为英特尔云计算科学技术中心的一部分，雅虎、APC、EMC、Facebook、Fusion-IO、谷歌、惠普、日立、华为、IBM、英特尔、微软、NEC、NetApp、甲骨文、Panasas、河床、三星、希捷、STEC、赛门铁克和VMware赠送礼物。我们感谢PDL联盟的成员公司的兴趣、见解、反馈和支持。
There are many baremetal frameworks available in market today. These baremetal frameworks help ease the work of a cluster/datacenter administrator by automating the deployment of operating systems and other software onto the individual machines in a datacenter. These frameworks differ from each other on several aspects like price, stability, maintainability, feature support and performance. As a result, it becomes difficult to choose the best framework which suits one’s needs. This study aims at helping the administrator in choosing the appropriate framework based on their needs by providing a comparison of these frameworks with a main emphasis on Emulab and OpenStack Ironic. Acknowledgements: This material is supported in part by the National Science Foundation under awards CNS-1042537 and CNS-1042543 (PRObE), by Intel as part of the Intel Science and Technology Center for Cloud Computing (ISTC-CC), by gifts from Yahoo!, APC, EMC, Facebook, Fusion-IO, Google, Hewlett-Packard, Hitachi, Huawei, IBM, Intel, Microsoft, NEC, NetApp, Oracle, Panasas, Riverbed, Samsung, Seagate, STEC, Symantec, and VMware. We thank the member companies of the PDL Consortium for their interest, insights, feedback, and support.