And they're out of the gate.
And they're out of the gate.
复制标题
他们已经出了门了。
DOI:
10.1113/jp281784
复制
发表时间:
2021
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Dale N
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Dale N
We have entered a golden age for the structural biology of gap junction-like proteins. The first high-resolution structure of a connexin was published in 2009 (Maeda et al. 2009). It took nearly 10 years for the next advance, which occurred only after cryoEM had matured to become the method of choice to determine the structures of membrane proteins. Recently, and in quick succession, high-resolution structures for Innexin6, Pannexin1, CalHM2, Cx46 and Cx50 (Myers et al. 2018) and Cx31. 3 (Leeet al. 2020) have been published. To continue my horse-racing analogy, the most recent structures for Cx46/50 (Flores et al. 2020), at a resolution of 1.9 Å, narrowly lead the field. In the gap junction configuration, connexins form a dodecameric complex consisting of two hexameric channels docked end to end. Each connexin subunit has four transmembrane segments, and an intracellular C-terminus. The helical N-terminus resides within the pore. As there are six of these N-termini, a long-standing idea has been that they form a plug that gates the channel. The paper by Yue et al (2021) published in this issue of the Journal of Physiology has made substantive steps towards detailed mechanistic understanding of channel gating by this N-terminus in Cx46/50 at an atomic level. CryoEM provides snapshots of structure. Although some dynamic information can be gleaned directly from cryoEM data, molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, by bringing life into what would otherwise be static images, help to reinforce the link between structure and function. MD takes into account the movements of residues within the constraints of the tertiary structure, and the energies of, and thus likelihood of, interactions between residues to produce a dynamic simulation of how they jockey for position. Clearly the better the quality of the input structure, the better the output from the MD. Fortunately, the residues in the N-terminus of Cx46/50 are well resolved even in the 3.4 Å structures used for this study, and this provides the basis for the insights gained in the current paper. As the authors had two structures of the very closely related Cx46 and Cx50 at their disposal, they swapped the N-termini of Cx46 and Cx50 to make chimaeric structures and compared the sequences of the N-termini to identify differences and thus make the relevant mutations that could alter function.While they simulated many different variants, their studies on the ninth residue (Asn in Cx50 and Arg in Cx46) are highly interesting. Their MD simulations revealed that in Cx46, Arg9 can form a salt bridge with Glu12 of the N-terminus of the neighbouring subunit and this was a predominant conformation in the simulations. An alternative conformation also existed (but less frequently), in which a pi-bond with Arg9 of the neighbouring subunit stabilized an interaction of Arg9 and Glu12 within the N-terminus of the same subunit. Obviously, these interactions are not present for the N-termini of Cx50 where the uncharged residue Asn9 is present instead. However, they are present to some degree for Cx50 where Asn9 has been mutated to Arginine. The net effect of these interactions is to move Arg9 to the side of the pore away from the permeation pathway, rather than sticking into the centre of the pore as modelled in the cryoEM structure. The free energy experienced by ions as they traverse the channel pore can also be calculated in MD simulations. The authors found that the free energy landscape for Cl–is fairly constant (and similar) throughout the pore in both Cx46 and 50. However, the N-terminus of Cx46, but not Cx50, offers a significant barrier to K+ permeation. Despite the fact that Arg9 is pressed against the side of the …