Misspecification in Moment Inequality Models: Back to Moment Equalities?
Misspecification in Moment Inequality Models: Back to Moment Equalities?
复制标题
矩不等式模型中的错误指定:回到矩不等式?
DOI:
10.1111/j.1368-423x.2010.00332.x
复制
发表时间:
2011
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
E. Tamer
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
M. Ponomareva;E. Tamer
Consider the linear model E[y | x] = x'β where one is interested in learning about β given data on y and x and when y is interval measured; that is, we observe ([y'8 y1], x) such that P(y ∈ [y'8 y1]) = 1. Moment inequality procedures use the implication E[y0 | x] ≤ x'β ≤ E[y1 | x]. As compared to least squares in the classical regression model, estimates obtained using an objective function based on these moment inequalities do not provide a clear approximation to the underlying unobserved conditional mean function. Most importantly, under misspecification, it is not unusual that no parameter β satisfies the previous inequalities for all values of x, and hence minima of an objective function based on these moment inequalities are typically tight.We construct set estimates for β in the linear model that have a clear interpretation when the model is misspecified. These sets are based on moment equality models. We illustrate these sets and compare them to estimates obtained using moment inequality-based methods. In addition to the linear model with interval outcomes we also analyse the binary missing data model with a monotone instrument assumption (MIV), we find there that when this assumption is misspecified, bounds can still be non-empty, and can differ from parameters obtained via maximum likelihood. We also examine a bivariate discrete game with multiple equilibria. In sum, misspecification in moment inequality models is of a different flavour than in moment equality models, and so care should be taken with (1) the˙interpretation of the estimates and (2) the size of the ‘identified set’.