A longitudinal study of friendship development.
A longitudinal study of friendship development.
复制标题
友谊发展的纵向研究。
DOI：
10.1037//0022-3514.48.4.909
复制
发表时间：
1985
影响因子：
7.6
通讯作者：
Hays,RB
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Hays,RB
在3周的时间间隔，在他们的第一个学期在大学，53名女性和31名男性新生完成了问卷调查，关于他们的关系与2同性的人，他们刚刚遇到。结果表明，在秋季学期结束时成功发展成亲密友谊的二人组在行为和态度上与没有进展的二人组不同。随着友谊的发展，亲密程度的双向互动占越来越大的百分比，在评级的友谊强度的变化超出了占绝对数量的互动。关系利益的评级一直与友谊强度呈正相关，并随着关系的进展而增加。亲密朋友和非亲密朋友之间的关系成本评分没有差异。秋季学期末的二元行为模式和态度评级是3个月后友谊状态的良好预测因子。动机和情境因素也与友谊结果相关。性别差异被注意到：女性从事更多的随意的情感行为与他们的亲密比与他们的非亲密的朋友。男性很少与他们的朋友有随意的感情，不管他们的亲密程度如何。结果重复了RB Hays（1984）的主要发现。(29参考）（PsycINFO数据库记录（c）2016阿帕，保留所有权利）
At 3-wk intervals during their 1st term at the university, 53 female and 31 male freshmen completed questionnaires regarding their relationships with 2 same-sex individuals whom they had just met. Results showed that dyads that successfully developed into close friendships by the end of the fall school term differed behaviorally and attitudinally from dyads that did not progress. As the friendships developed, the intimacy level of dyadic interaction accounted for an increasing percentage of the variance in ratings of friendship intensity beyond that accounted for by the sheer quantity of interaction. Ratings of relationship benefits were consistently positively correlated with friendship intensity and increased as the relationship progressed. There were no differences in ratings of relationship costs between close and nonclose friends. Dyadic behavior patterns and attitude ratings at the end of the fall school term were good predictors of friendship status 3 mo later. Motivational and situational factors were also correlated with friendship outcomes. Sex differences were noted: Females engaged in more casual affection behaviors with their close than with their nonclose friends. Males engaged in little casual affection with their friends, regardless of their degree of closeness. Results replicate the major findings of RB Hays (1984).(29 ref)(PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)