Undoing Appropriateness: Raciolinguistic Ideologies and Language Diversity in Education
Undoing Appropriateness: Raciolinguistic Ideologies and Language Diversity in Education
复制标题
消除适当性：种族语言意识形态和教育中的语言多样性
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2015
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
J. Rosa
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
N. Flores;J. Rosa
在本文中，纳尔逊·弗洛雷斯和乔纳森·罗莎批评了基于适当性的教育语言多样性方法。那些赞同这些方法的人将标准化语言实践概念化为一组适合学术环境的客观语言形式。相比之下，弗洛雷斯和罗莎强调了种族语言主义意识形态，通过这种意识形态，种族化的身体被构建为参与适当的学术语言实践。他们借鉴语言意识形态和种族化理论，提供了一个视角，从这个角度来看，被归类为长期英语学习者、传统语言学习者和标准英语学习者的学生可以被理解为处于一种共同的种族定位中，这种定位将他们的语言实践视为有缺陷的，无论他们多么严格地遵循所谓的适当性规则。作者通过阐述，说明了基于适当性的语言教育方法如何与种族规范的再现有关……
In this article, Nelson Flores and Jonathan Rosa critique appropriateness-based approaches to language diversity in education. Those who subscribe to these approaches conceptualize standardized linguistic practices as an objective set of linguistic forms that are appropriate for an academic setting. In contrast, Flores and Rosa highlight the raciolinguistic ideologies through which racialized bodies come to be constructed as engaging in appropriately academic linguistic practices. Drawing on theories of language ideologies and racialization, they offer a perspective from which students classified as long-term English learners, heritage language learners, and Standard English learners can be understood to inhabit a shared racial positioning that frames their linguistic practices as deficient regardless of how closely they follow supposed rules of appropriateness. The authors illustrate how appropriateness-based approaches to language education are implicated in the reproduction of racial normativity by exp...