Sacred sites--contested rites/rights
Sacred sites--contested rites/rights
复制标题
圣地——有争议的仪式/权利
DOI：
10.5860/choice.45-6866
复制
发表时间：
2007
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
R. Wallis
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Jenny Blain;R. Wallis
我们的圣地，有争议的仪式/权利项目（www.sacredsites.org.uk）研究了今天的异教徒与圣地的物理，精神和解释性参与，理论化“神圣”，并探讨了异教徒参与遗产管理和考古学的影响，更普遍的是，在“保护伦理”方面与积极参与。在这篇文章中，我们探讨的方式，其中“圣地”-无论是长期和网站-是由不同的利益集团进行谈判，前景化我们的位置，作为一个考古学家/艺术历史学家（沃利斯）和人类学家（布兰），并积极异教徒与网站。异教徒在这类地点，包括在埃夫伯里和巨石阵的行动，不仅表明他们与圣地的接触是多种多样的，由此产生的身份-如“新土著人”的身份-是复杂的，而且还表明遗产管理并没有完全忽视这些问题。除了管理开放访问冬至庆祝活动在S.
Our Sacred Sites, Contested Rites/Rights project (www.sacredsites.org.uk) examines physical, spiritual and interpretative engagements of today’s pagans with sacred sites, theorizes ‘sacredness’, and explores the implications of pagan engagements with sites for heritage management and archaeology more generally, in terms of ‘preservation ethic’ vis-a-vis active engagement. In this article, we explore ways in which ‘sacred sites’ - both the term and the sites - are negotiated by different interest groups, foregrounding our locations, as an archaeologist/art historian (Wallis) and anthropologist (Blain), and active pagan engagers with sites. Examples of pagan actions at such sites, including at Avebury and Stonehenge, demonstrate not only that their engagements with sacred sites are diverse and that identities - such as that of ‘new indigenes’ - arising therefrom are complex, but also that heritage management has not entirely neglected the issues. In addition to managed open access solstice celebrations at S...