Antecedents and outcomes of abusive supervision: Test of a trickle-down model
Antecedents and outcomes of abusive supervision: Test of a trickle-down model
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.191
复制
发表时间：
2007-01-01
影响因子：
9.9
通讯作者：
Debrah, Yaw A.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Aryee, Samuel;Chen, Zhen Xiong;Debrah, Yaw A.
作者研究了苛虐式监管的前因，以及互动公平和程序公平作为苛虐式监管与情感性组织承诺以及指向个人和组织的公民行为这些工作结果之间关系的中介变量的相对重要性。数据来自中国东南部一家电信公司的上下级配对。调节回归分析的结果显示，独裁领导风格调节了管理者的互动公平感知与苛虐式监管之间的关系，即独裁领导风格较高的管理者其这种关系比独裁领导风格较低的管理者更强。此外，结构方程模型分析的结果显示，下属的互动公平感知而非程序公平感知完全中介了苛虐式监管与工作结果之间的关系。文中还讨论了对苛虐式监管未来研究的启示。
The authors examined antecedents of abusive supervision and the relative importance of interactional and procedural justice as mediators of the relationship between abusive supervision and the work outcomes of affective organizational commitment and individual- and organization-directed citizenship behaviors. Data were obtained from subordinate-supervisor dyads from a telecommunication company located in southeastern China. Results of moderated regression analysis revealed that authoritarian leadership style moderated the relationship between supervisors' perceptions of interactional justice and abusive supervision such that the relationship was stronger for supervisors high rather than low in authoritarian leadership style. In addition, results of structural equation modeling analysis revealed that subordinates' perceptions of interactional but not procedural justice fully mediated the relationship between abusive supervision and the work outcomes. Implications for future investigations of abusive supervision are discussed.