METHODS AND THEORY OF RELIABILITY
METHODS AND THEORY OF RELIABILITY
复制标题
DOI：
10.1097/00005053-197611000-00003
复制
发表时间：
1976-01-01
影响因子：
1.9
通讯作者：
CARPENTER, WT
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
BARTKO, JJ;CARPENTER, WT
最常用的和误用的可靠性措施出现在精神卫生文献进行了审查。评估可靠性的各种类型的数据集（即，2名评分员、2名以上评分员和不同数量的评分员（具有二分、多分和定量数据）。适用于每种数据格式的可靠性统计。一些方法的不足之处突出。讨论了用各种统计量得到的不同可靠性水平的意义。本评论旨在供阅读专业人员和偶尔需要进行可靠性评估的研究者使用。不需要统计专业知识，理论材料供感兴趣的读者参考。必要的计算公式见附录。一些合适的可靠性措施的汇总表。
The most frequently used and misused reliability measures appearing in the mental health literature are reviewed. The various types of data sets on which reliability is assessed (i.e., 2 raters, more than 2 raters and varying numbers of raters with dichotomous, polychotomous and quantitative data) are illustrated. Reliability statistics appropriate for each data format are presented. Inadequacies of some methods are highlighted. The meaning of different levels of reliability obtained with various statistics is discussed. This critique is intended for the reading professional and the investigator who has an occasional need for reliability assessment. Statistical expertise is not required, and theoretical material is referenced for the interested reader. Necessary formulas for computations are presented in the appendices. A summary table of some suitable reliability measures is presented.