The processing of novel and lexicalised prefixed words in reading

The processing of novel and lexicalised prefixed words in reading
复制标题

DOI:
10.1080/01690960801945484
复制
发表时间:
2008-11-01
期刊:
LANGUAGE AND COGNITIVE PROCESSES
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Juhasz, Barbara
Juhasz, Barbara
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Pollatsek, Alexander;Slattery, Timothy J.;Juhasz, Barbara

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

两个实验比较了相对较长的新前缀词(例如,overfarm)和现有前缀词在阅读中进行处理。新前缀词的使用允许一个检查的作用,全词的访问和分解加工的非新前缀词的加工。这两个实验发现,尽管新奇性的成本很高(例如,注视持续时间对于新前缀词长约100 ms),对于大多数测量,词根词素的频率对固定测量的影响对于新前缀词和非新前缀词大致相同。这一发现排除了(“赛马”)双路线模型的处理现有的前缀词,其中的整个词和分解路线是平行和独立的,因为这样的模型将预测一个更大的根频率的影响,为新的单词(其中整个词的过程不存在)。平行互动模式是解释前缀词加工的最有可能的模式。
Two experiments compared how relatively long novel prefixed words (e.g., overfarm) and existing prefixed words were processed in reading. The use of novel prefixed words allows one to examine the roles of whole-word access and decompositional processing in the processing of non-novel prefixed words. The two experiments found that, although there was a large cost to novelty (e.g., gaze durations were about 100 ms longer for novel prefixed words), the effect of the frequency of the root morpheme on Fixation measures was about the same for novel and non-novel prefixed words for most measures. This finding rules out a ("horse-race") dual-route model of processing for existing prefixed words in which the whole-word and decompositional route are parallel and independent, as such a model would predict a substantially larger root frequency effect for novel words (where whole-word processes do not exist). The most likely model to explain the processing of prefixed words is a parallel interactive one.