Artificial intelligence assists identifying malignant versus benign liver lesions using contrast-enhanced ultrasound.
Artificial intelligence assists identifying malignant versus benign liver lesions using contrast-enhanced ultrasound.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1111/jgh.15522
复制
发表时间:
2021-10
影响因子:
4.1
通讯作者:
Kuang M
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Hu HT;Wang W;Chen LD;Ruan SM;Chen SL;Li X;Lu MD;Xie XY;Kuang M
This study aims to construct a strategy that uses assistance from artificial intelligence (AI) to assist radiologists in the identification of malignant versus benign focal liver lesions (FLLs) using contrast‐enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). A training set (patients = 363) and a testing set (patients = 211) were collected from our institute. On four‐phase CEUS images in the training set, a composite deep learning architecture was trained and tuned for differentiating malignant and benign FLLs. In the test dataset, AI performance was evaluated by comparison with radiologists with varied levels of experience. Based on the comparison, an AI assistance strategy was constructed, and its usefulness in reducing CEUS interobserver heterogeneity was further tested. In the test set, to identify malignant versus benign FLLs, AI achieved an area under the curve of 0.934 (95% CI 0.890–0.978) with an accuracy of 91.0%. Comparing with radiologists reviewing videos along with complementary patient information, AI outperformed residents (82.9–84.4%, P = 0.038) and matched the performance of experts (87.2–88.2%, P = 0.438). Due to the higher positive predictive value (PPV) (AI: 95.6% vs residents: 88.6–89.7%, P = 0.056), an AI strategy was defined to improve the malignant diagnosis. With the assistance of AI, radiologists exhibited a sensitivity improvement of 97.0–99.4% (P < 0.05) and an accuracy of 91.0–92.9% (P = 0.008–0.189), which was comparable with that of the experts (P = 0.904). The CEUS‐based AI strategy improved the performance of residents and reduced CEUS's interobserver heterogeneity in the differentiation of benign and malignant FLLs.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
29.4
作者:
Ilyas SI;Gores GJ
通讯作者:
Gores GJ
影响因子:
19.7
作者:
Li, Wei;Wang, Wei;Lu, Ming-De
通讯作者:
Lu, Ming-De
影响因子:
19.7
作者:
Lakhani, Paras;Sundaram, Baskaran
通讯作者:
Sundaram, Baskaran
影响因子:
5.9
作者:
Hamm, Charlie A.;Wang, Clinton J.;Letzen, Brian
通讯作者:
Letzen, Brian
影响因子:
2.1
作者:
Guo, Le-Hang;Wang, Dan;Xu, Hui-Xiong
通讯作者:
Xu, Hui-Xiong