Using peer reviews to examine micropolitics and disciplinary development of engineering education: a case study
Using peer reviews to examine micropolitics and disciplinary development of engineering education: a case study
复制标题
利用同行评审来审视工程教育的微观政治和学科发展：案例研究
DOI：
10.1080/01596306.2012.745735
复制
发表时间：
2014
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
K. Beddoes
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
K. Beddoes
本文介绍了一个案例研究的同行评议过程中的女权主义者的文章提交给工程教育杂志。它展示了如何检查同行评议可以是一个有用的方法，以进一步了解女性主义思想在教育领域的发展。而不是反对女权主义思想本身，我的经验表明，反对女权主义对工程教育的贡献的信念对那些旨在参与女权主义思想的人构成了挑战。
This article presents a case study of the peer review process for a feminist article submitted to an engineering education journal. It demonstrates how an examination of peer review can be a useful approach to further understanding the development of feminist thought in education fields. Rather than opposition to feminist thought per se, my experience reveals that opposing beliefs about what a feminist contribution to engineering education entails pose a challenge to those aiming to engage with feminist thought.