Conducting a systematic review.
Conducting a systematic review.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/s1036-7314(00)70624-2
复制
发表时间：
2000-05-01
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Evans, D
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Jones, T;Evans, D
为了应对不断增长的医疗保健文献数量和报告研究质量的参差不齐，系统评价因其对研究的严格总结而越来越多地被用来指导医疗保健决策。系统评价利用有计划的方法来识别、评估，然后总结个别研究的结果。进行系统评价的步骤包括： 准备详细的研究方案；选择纳入评论的文章的标准；系统地检索已发表和未发表的文献；确定哪些文章符合预定的纳入标准；批判性地评价研究的质量；从研究报告中提取结果数据，并在适当的情况下对数据进行统计组合，以总结有关感兴趣主题的最佳可用证据。这些过程记录在系统审查报告中，并且可以像其他研究一样接受同行审查和批评。
In response to the growing volume of health care literature and the variable quality of reported studies, systematic reviews have increasingly been used to guide health care decisions because of their rigorous summary of the research. Systematic reviews utilise planned methods of identifying, appraising, then summarising the results from individual studies. The steps in performing a systematic review include: preparing a detailed research protocol; selecting criteria for inclusion of articles in the review; systematically searching the published and unpublished literature; determining which articles meet the predefined inclusion criteria; critically appraising the quality of the research; extracting outcome data from the research report and statistically combining data, where appropriate, in order to summarise the best available evidence on the topic of interest. These processes are documented in the systematic review report, and can be subject to peer review and critique like other research.