Conformal Radiotherapy and Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy: Clinical Data
Conformal Radiotherapy and Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy: Clinical Data
复制标题
适形放射治疗和调强放射治疗:临床数据
DOI:
10.1080/028418600750013249
复制
发表时间:
2000
期刊:
影响因子:
3.1
通讯作者:
M. F. Eschwège
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
M. F. Eschwège
Conformal radiotherapy (CRT) is based on three hypotheses: (i) a higher rate of local control can improve the survival rate; (ii) dose escalation can increase tumor control; and (iii) CRT allows the delivery of higher doses by decreasing the incidence of late effects. These postulates are now supported by several data. Three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) has markedly progressed since its introduction two decades ago. However, there are situations for which 3D-CRT cannot produce a satisfactory treatment plan because of complex target volume shapes or the close proximity of sensitive normal tissues. This is why intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) was introduced. Its aim is to overcome the limitations of 3D-CRT by adding modulators of beam intensity to beam shaping. IMRT can achieve nearly any dose distribution; however, the role of the planner remains crucial. CRT has been investigated mainly for prostate cancers and head and neck cancers. By and large, the clinical data, although still limited, seem to confirm the advantages of this type of radiotherapy. Dose escalation in prostate cancers improves the local control rate without increasing late effects and for this cancer site IMRT appears to be a significant advance over conventional 3D-CRT. In head and neck cancers the clinical data are still scarce but encouraging. CRT should be investigated in breast cancers with the aim of reducing the incidence of late effects. The available data underline the great potential for major progress in 3D-CRT and IMRT. The techniques are still costly and time consuming, nevertheless they merit investigation since their cost should decrease. Efforts should be concentrated on the specification of robust optimization criteria, taking into account clinical and radiobiological data.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI:
10.1148/radiology.209.1.9769828
发表时间:
1998
期刊:
Radiology.
影响因子:
--
作者:
Zelefsky,MJ;Fuks,Z;Wolfe,T;Kutcher,GJ;Burman,C;Ling,CC;Venkatraman,ES;Leibel,SA
通讯作者:
Leibel,SA
DOI:
10.1016/0360-3016(92)90039-k
发表时间:
1992
期刊:
International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics
影响因子:
--
作者:
Thames,HD;Schultheiss,TE;Hendry,JH;Tucker,SL;Dubray,BM;Brock,WA
通讯作者:
Brock,WA
DOI:
10.1016/0360-3016(93)90337-u
发表时间:
1993
期刊:
International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics
影响因子:
--
作者:
LoSasso,T;Chui,CS;Kutcher,GJ;Leibel,SA;Fuks,Z;Ling,CC
通讯作者:
Ling,CC
DOI:
10.1001/jama.1993.03510160067031
发表时间:
1993-10
期刊:
JAMA
影响因子:
--
作者:
S. Hancock;M. Tucker;R. Hoppe
通讯作者:
S. Hancock;M. Tucker;R. Hoppe
DOI:
10.1016/s0360-3016(97)00343-x
发表时间:
1997-10-01
影响因子:
7
作者:
Marks, LB;Munley, MT;Anscher, M
通讯作者:
Anscher, M