The Urban Partnership Agreement: A Comparative Study of Technology and Collaboration in Transportation Policy Implementation
The Urban Partnership Agreement: A Comparative Study of Technology and Collaboration in Transportation Policy Implementation
复制标题
城市伙伴关系协议：交通政策实施中技术与合作的比较研究
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2011
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
A. Imboden
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
J. Bryson;B. Crosby;M. Stone;Emily Saunoi;A. Imboden
今天的公共管理者所面临的问题往往太大，不能由一个单一的实体来解决，需要跨政府，非营利组织和商业部门的合作。随着新技术和系统方法改变交通运输领域，跨部门合作已成为日益重要的政策制定和执行方法。特别是在运输领域，各种技术的组合往往对实施旨在缓解交通拥堵等问题的全系统战略至关重要。在许多情况下，有效交通政策的设计者和执行者必须将各种技术与灵活的关系建立和管理相结合。通过对三项城市伙伴关系协定倡议的比较案例研究，本研究将探讨如何将技术和协作过程结合起来，以实现重要的交通目标，并更普遍地创造公共价值。报告首先叙述了2008年6月至2009年8月双城大都会地区城市伙伴关系方案的实施阶段;该方案在纽约市的发展和最终解体;以及迈阿密方案的发展和实施。随后的章节涵盖了方法，在明尼苏达州，纽约市，和迈阿密的UPA合作的关键方面的调查结果，结论和交通政策，规划和实施的影响，以及更普遍的合作。
The problems faced by today's public managers are often too large to be solved by a single entity and require collaboration across government, nonprofit, and business sectors. As new technologies and systematic approaches transform the transportation field, cross-sector collaboration has become an increasingly important policy development and implementation approach. Particularly within the transportation field, an assemblage of technologies is often critical to implementing system-wide strategies aimed at, for example, mitigating traffic congestion. In many cases, designers and implementers of effective transportation policies must combine a variety of technologies with deft relationship building and management. Through the development of comparative case studies of three of the Urban Partnership Agreement initiatives, this research study will examine how technology and collaborative processes may be combined to achieve important transportation goals and create public value more generally. The report begins with a narrative description of the implementation phase of the Urban Partnership program in the Twin Cities metro area from June 2008 through August 2009; the development and ultimate unraveling of the program in New York City; and the development and implementation of the Miami program. Subsequent sections cover the methodology, findings about key aspects of the UPA collaboration in Minnesota, New York City, and Miami, and conclusions and implications for transportation policy, planning, and implementation, as well as collaboration more generally.