The Effectiveness of Technology-Based Strategies to Promote Engagement With Digital Interventions: A Systematic Review Protocol
The Effectiveness of Technology-Based Strategies to Promote Engagement With Digital Interventions: A Systematic Review Protocol
复制标题
DOI：
10.2196/resprot.3990
复制
发表时间：
2015-04-01
影响因子：
1.7
通讯作者：
Murray, Elizabeth
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Alkhaldi, Ghadah;Hamilton, Fiona L.;Murray, Elizabeth
背景资料：数字干预措施提供了有效和潜在的成本效益模式，以改善健康成果，因为它们提供的健康信息和服务是广泛传播的，保密的，可以根据个人用户的需求量身定制。数字干预措施已成功用于健康促进、心理健康和实现长期状况的自我管理。然而，其有效性受到使用率低的限制，不参与是一个主要挑战。因此，它是至关重要的，以找到有效的策略，以增加用户参与数字interventions.Objective：本系统评价的目的是评估的有效性，以技术为基础的战略，以促进参与数字interventions.Methods：我们将遵循科克伦协作指南的系统评价方法。检索策略将在7个电子数据库（包括MEDLINE、EMBASE、PsycINFO、CINAHL）中执行，使用“数字干预”和“参与”概念，受研究类型（随机对照试验）限制。将检索纳入研究的灰色文献和参考文献列表。标题和摘要将由2名作者独立筛选。然后将获得潜在合格论文的全文并进行双重筛选。合格论文中的数据将由一位作者提取，并由另一位作者检查准确性。将使用科克伦偏倚评估工具评估偏倚。叙述性综合将报告所有纳入的研究，适当时，将使用荟萃分析汇总数据。将根据系统性综述和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目报告所有结果。如有必要，将进一步调查异质性的来源。结果：我们的研究正在进行中。系统性综述的最终草案正在撰写中，将于2015年底前提交。结论：综述结果将为研究人员和数字干预提供者提供有关最佳使用基于技术的策略以促进参与数字干预的信息。
Background: Digital interventions provide effective and potentially cost-effective models for improving health outcomes as they deliver health information and services that are widely disseminated, confidential, and can be tailored to needs of the individual user. Digital interventions have been used successfully for health promotion, mental health, and for enabling self-management of long-term conditions. However, their effectiveness is limited by low usage rates, with non-engagement a major challenge. Hence, it is crucial to find effective strategies to increase user engagement with digital interventions.Objective: This systematic review will aim to evaluate the effectiveness of technology-based strategies to promote engagement with digital interventions.Methods: We will follow Cochrane Collaboration guidelines on systematic review methodology. The search strategy will be executed across seven e-databases (including MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL) using the concepts "digital intervention" and "engagement", limited by study type (randomized controlled trial). Grey literature and reference lists of included studies will be searched. Titles and abstracts will be independently screened by 2 authors. Then the full text of potentially eligible papers will be obtained and double screened. Data from eligible papers will be extracted by 1 author and checked for accuracy by another author. Bias will be assessed using the Cochrane bias assessment tool. Narrative synthesis will report on all included studies, and where appropriate, data will be pooled using meta-analysis. All findings will be reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Sources of heterogeneity will be further investigated if required.Results: Our research is in progress. The final draft of the systematic review is being written and will be submitted before the end of 2015.Conclusions: The review findings will inform researchers and digital intervention providers about optimal use of technology-based strategies to promote engagement with digital interventions.