Eat for Life: A Work Site Feasibility Study of a Novel Mindfulness-Based Intuitive Eating Intervention
Eat for Life: A Work Site Feasibility Study of a Novel Mindfulness-Based Intuitive Eating Intervention
复制标题
DOI：
10.4278/ajhp.120404-quan-186
复制
发表时间：
2014-07-01
影响因子：
2.7
通讯作者：
Schopp, Laura
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Bush, Hannah E.;Rossy, Lynn;Schopp, Laura
目的.研究一种新的干预方法对有问题的饮食行为和身体不满的有效性。在干预或等待名单对照组中登记的参与者在10周前和10周后进行评估。中西部大学。学科。124名女性员工或伴侣/配偶。干预。为生命而吃是一个为期10周的团体干预，整合了正念和直觉饮食技巧。自我报告问卷包括直觉饮食量表，身体欣赏量表，五方面正念问卷，饮食失调诊断问卷，以及作者构建的补充和人口统计学分析。协方差分析和有序回归测量组间差异。结构方程模型检验中介效应。观察到两组之间在身体欣赏方面存在显著差异（F-1，F-121 = 40.17，p = 0.000，偏eta平方= 0.25），直觉进食（F-1，F-121 = 67.44，p = 0.000，偏eta平方= 0.36）和正念（F-1，F-121 = 30.50，p = 0.000，偏eta平方= 0.20），10周后干预组的平均得分显著高于等待名单对照组。干预组无症状进食障碍的可能性是对照组的3.65倍。正念作为一个部分mediatorConclusion。该研究为结合直觉饮食和正念治疗有问题的饮食行为和身体不满的干预提供了支持，其局限性包括自我选择和缺乏主动控制组。
Purpose. To examine the efficacy of a novel intervention for problematic eating behaviors and body dissatisfaction.Design. Participants enrolled in the intervention or waitlist comparison group were assessed at pre and post 10 weeks.Setting. Midwestern university.Subjects. One hundred twenty-four female employees or partners/spouses.Intervention. Eat for Life is a 10-week group intervention integrating mindfulness and intuitive eating skills.Measures. Self-report questionnaires included the Intuitive Eating Scale, Body Appreciation Scale, Five-Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire, Questionnaire for Eating Disorder Diagnoses, and an author-constructed supplemental and demographic questionnaire.Analysis. Analyses of covariance and ordinal regression measured group differences. Structural equation modeling examined mediation effects.Results. Significant differences between groups were observed for body appreciation (F-1,F-121 = 40.17, p = .000, partial eta squared = .25), intuitive eating (F-1,F-121 = 67.44, p = .000, partial eta squared = .36), and mindfulness (F-1,F-121 = 30.50, p = .000, partial eta squared = .20), with mean scores significantly higher in the intervention group than waitlist comparison group after 10 weeks. The intervention group was 3.65 times more likely to be asymptomatic for disordered eating than the comparison group. Mindfulness served as a partial mediatorConclusion. The study provides support for an intervention combining intuitive eating and mindfulness for treatment of problematic eating behaviors and body dissatisfaction, with limitations including self-selection and lack of active control group.