Designing long-term policy: rethinking transition management
Designing long-term policy: rethinking transition management
复制标题
设计长期政策：重新思考转型管理
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2009
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
J. Grin
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
J. Voss;Adrian Smith;J. Grin
在可持续发展方面，长期政策正在某种程度上得到恢复。当前的复兴试图避免早期实证主义长期规划和控制方法的陷阱。相反，这一新一代政策设计强调的是反身性治理概念。这些课程旨在通过审议、探索和学习，引导和引导社会技术变革的复杂进程。这一举措的一个实际表现是在研究人员和实践者中引起越来越多的国际关注，这就是荷兰的“过渡管理”（TM）政策。本文总结了迄今为止的TM实施经验，并讨论了它为长期政策设计提出的关键问题。这篇文章为这期特刊提供了一个框架和综合，其中包括更深入地解决一系列这些问题的文章。我们强调三个关键问题：社会学习的政治，上下文嵌入的政策设计和设计过程本身的动态。这使我们提出一个观点，政策设计作为一个有争议的社会创新过程。我们的结论认为，在实践中，以及民主政治的自反能力设计过渡管理的持续工作的影响。
Long-term policy is enjoying something of a come-back in connection with sustainable development. The current revival tries to avoid the pitfalls of an earlier generation of positivistic long-range planning and control approaches. Instead, this new generation of policy design emphasises reflexive governance concepts. These aim at inducing and navigating complex processes of socio-technical change by means of deliberation, probing and learning. A practical expression of this move that is attracting growing international attention amongst researchers and practitioners is the policy of ‘Transition Management’ (TM) in the Netherlands. This article takes stock of TM implementation experience to date and discusses the critical issues it raises for long-term policy design. The article provides a framework and synthesis for this Special Issue, which comprises articles that address a range of those issues in more depth. We highlight three critical issues: the politics of societal learning, contextual embedding of policy design and dynamics of the design process itself. This leads us to propose a view on policy design as a contested process of social innovation. Our conclusion considers implications for continued work on designing transition management in practice as well as the reflexive capacities of democratic politics.