Longitudinal and integrative tests of family stress model effects on Mexican origin adolescents.
Longitudinal and integrative tests of family stress model effects on Mexican origin adolescents.
复制标题
家庭压力模型对墨西哥裔青少年影响的纵向和综合测试。
DOI：
10.1037/a0038993
复制
发表时间：
2015
影响因子：
4
通讯作者：
Tein,Jenn-Yun
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
White,RebeccaMB;Liu,Yu;Nair,RajniL;Tein,Jenn-Yun
家庭压力模型是一个共同的框架，通过它来检查环境压力对青少年适应的影响。该模型表明，经济和邻里压力影响青年调整通过中断养育。运用整合发展理论，我们研究了父母的文化价值取向在多大程度上减轻了压力源对养育中断的影响，以及环境逆境在多大程度上限制了养育对青少年适应的影响。我们测试了假设的综合家庭压力模型纵向样本的母亲-青年二人组（N= 749）和父亲-青年二人组（N= 467）从墨西哥血统的家庭，跨越3个时间点，从青春期早期到中期。提供了第一个纵向证据的家庭压力介导的影响，母亲的经济压力的看法与增加青少年外化症状5年后，通过中间增加严厉的养育。其余的研究结果支持的概念，即综合发展理论可以告知家庭压力模型假设检验是文化和上下文相关的各种不同的家庭和青年。例如，父亲对经济压力和邻里危险的看法对青少年的内化有重要影响，通过减少父亲的温暖，但只有在一定程度的邻里逆境。母亲的家庭主义价值取向减轻了经济压力对母亲温暖的影响，保护他们的青少年免受环境压力相关的发展成本。结果进行了讨论，确定如何整合发展理论与家庭压力模型交叉设置不同的青年在不同的发展道路。
The family stress model represents a common framework through which to examine the effects of environmental stressors on adolescent adjustment. The model suggests that economic and neighborhood stressors influence youth adjustment via disruptions to parenting. Incorporating integrative developmental theory, we examined the degree to which parents’ cultural value orientations mitigated the effects of stressors on parenting disruptions and the degree to which environmental adversity qualified the effect of parenting on adolescent adjustment. We tested the hypothesized integrative family stress model longitudinally in a sample of mother–youth dyads (N= 749) and father–youth dyads (N= 467) from Mexican origin families, across 3 times points spanning early to middle adolescence. Providing the first longitudinal evidence of family stress mediated effects, mothers’ perceptions of economic pressure were associated with increases in adolescent externalizing symptoms 5 years later via intermediate increases in harsh parenting. The remaining findings supported the notion that integrative developmental theory can inform family stress model hypothesis testing that is culturally and contextually relevant for a wide range of diverse families and youth. For example, fathers’ perceptions of economic pressure and neighborhood danger had important implications for adolescent internalizing, via reductions in paternal warmth, but only at certain levels of neighborhood adversity. Mothers’ familism value orientations mitigated the effects of economic pressure on maternal warmth, protecting their adolescents from experiencing developmental costs associated with environmental stressors. Results are discussed in terms of identifying how integrative developmental theory intersects with the family stress model to set diverse youth on different developmental pathways.