Misreporting of energy and micronutrient intake estimated by food records and 24 hour recalls, control and adjustment methods in practice
Misreporting of energy and micronutrient intake estimated by food records and 24 hour recalls, control and adjustment methods in practice
复制标题
DOI：
10.1017/s0007114509990602
复制
发表时间：
2009-07-01
影响因子：
3.6
通讯作者：
van't Veer, Pieter
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Poslusna, Kamila;Ruprich, Jiri;van't Veer, Pieter
为了评估营养充足性，需要对营养摄入量进行有效的估计。饮食评估的主要错误之一是误报。目的是回顾膳食评估中误报的程度、性质和决定因素。这如何影响报告的微量营养素摄入量，如何确定和测量，以及在解释结果时确定处理误报的最佳方法。对通过24小时回忆或估计或称重食物记录误报成人饮食摄入量的研究进行了系统的文献检索。出版至2008年3月。确定了37项相关研究。确定了误报的可能原因。用于识别误报的最常用方法是Goldberg截止（46%的研究）和双标记水技术（24%的研究）。在所有三种饮食评估方法中，误报能量摄入的程度相似。少报的比例约为30%，能量摄入被低估了约15%。七篇论文提供了微量营养素摄入的可用数据。低能量报告组的铁、钙和维生素C（所有论文中提到的三种微量营养素）的绝对摄入量平均比非低能量报告组低30%，尽管结果不一致，但低能量报告组的微量营养素密度有较高的趋势。讨论了排除低报或使用能量调节方法的微量营养素摄入量。在解释基于食物记录和24小时召回的研究结果时，能量调整的剩余方法似乎是一种很好的实践工具，可以减少误报的影响。
In order to assess nutritional adequacy, valid estimates of nutrient intake are required. One of the main errors in dietary assessment is misreporting. The objective was to review the extent, nature and determinants of misreporting in dietary assessment. how this affects reported intakes of micronutrients and how this is identified and measured, and to identify the best ways of dealing with misreporting when interpreting results. A systematic literature search was conducted for studies of misreporting of dietary intake in adults by 24 hour recalls or by estimated or weighed food records. published up to March 2008. Thirty-seven relevant studies were identified. Possible causes of misreporting were identified. Methods most used to identify misreporting were the Goldberg cut-off (46% studies) and the doubly labelled water technique (24% Studies). The Magnitude of misreporting of energy intake was similar in all three dietary assessment methods. The percentage of under-reporters Was about 30% and energy intake was underestimated by approximately 15%. Seven papers presented usable data for micronutrient intake. Absolute intakes of Fe, Ca and vitamin C (the three micronutrients addressed in all papers) were on average 30% lower in low-energy reporters (LER) than that in non-LER and, although results were not consistent, there was a tendency for micronutrient density to be higher in LER. Excluding underreporters Or using energy adjustment methods for micronutrient intakes is discussed. Residual method of energy adjustment seems to be it good tool for practice to decrease an influence of misreporting when interpreting results of studies based on food records and 24 hour recalls.