Class struggle and the deproletarianisation of agricultural labour in Haryana (India)
Class struggle and the deproletarianisation of agricultural labour in Haryana (India)
复制标题
哈里亚纳邦（印度）的阶级斗争和农业劳动力的去无产阶级化
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
1990
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
T. Brass
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
T. Brass
本文认为，在劳动附着理论化的方式，无论是在20世纪50年代的农业劳动调查，并随后在工作中的鲁德拉，Bardhan和不来曼。所有这些文本的共同之处是，对依附劳动的积极概念化，从而消除了它的不自由因素。相反，这种关系表现为土地所有者和工人之间的物质互惠交换，从后者的观点来看，这种交易相当于一种非常受欢迎的工作保险或生活保障形式。相反，这里提出，依附构成了资本在阶级斗争过程中进行的去无产阶级化，而在哈里亚纳邦，农业劳动力强烈反对这种就业。
This article considers the way in which labour attachment is theorised, both in the 1950s Agricultural Labour Enquiries, and subsequently in the work of Rudra, Bardhan, and Breman. Common to all these texts is a positive conceptualisation of attached labour, and consequently the elimination of its element of unfreedom. Instead, the relation is presented in terms of a materially reciprocal exchange between landholder and worker, a transaction which from the viewpoint of the latter corresponds to a much sought‐after form of job insurance or subsistence guarantee. By contrast, it is suggested here that attachment constitutes de‐proletarianisation undertaken by capital in the course of class struggle, and that in Haryana the agricultural work‐force strongly dislikes this kind of employment.