Antecedents and consequences of acculturation preferences of non-indigenous Chileans in relation to an indigenous minority : Longitudinal survey evidence

Antecedents and consequences of acculturation preferences of non-indigenous Chileans in relation to an indigenous minority : Longitudinal survey evidence
复制标题

非土著智利人相对于土著少数民族的文化适应偏好的前因和后果:纵向调查证据

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2009
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Roberto González
Roberto González
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Hanna Zagefka;Rupert Brown;Roberto González

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

两个纵向调查研究进行了非土著多数智利参与者(Ns = 755横截面,198纵向研究1; 390横截面,333纵向研究2)。与大多数以前的研究相比,纵向设计允许直接测试假设的因果方向的影响。有两个广泛的研究问题。第一,非原住民多数族群成员的文化涵化偏好与对原住民马普切人的负面影响之间的关系为何?更具体地说,倾向于融合是否比倾向于同化、分离或边缘化带来更少的负面影响?与此相关的是,文化维持和接触的维度单独预测负面影响和/或反之亦然?第二,马普切人的知识是否会间接影响文化适应偏好,部分是通过对马普切人的同情来介导的?结果证实,知识影响文化适应偏好,同情是一个部分中介。文化适应偏好反过来又会影响消极情感。分类文化适应策略的接触维度是结果的预测因子,而文化维持维度则不是。研究结果的影响进行了讨论。
Two longitudinal survey studies were conducted with non-indigenous majority Chilean participants (Ns =755 cross-sectional, 198 longitudinal in study 1; 390 cross-sectional, 333 longitudinal in study 2). In contrast to most previous research, the longitudinal design allowed to test directly the hypothesised causal direction of effects. There were two broad research questions. Firstly, what is the relationship between acculturation preferences of non-indigenous majority members and negative affect towards the indigenous Mapuche? More specifically, does a preference for integration lead to less negative affect than a preference for assimilation, separation or marginalisation? Related to this, do the dimensions of culture maintenance and contact taken singly predict negative affect and/or vice versa? Secondly, does knowledge about the Mapuche causally and indirectly influence acculturation preferences, partially mediated by sympathy with the Mapuche? Results confirmed that knowledge influenced acculturation preferences, and that sympathy was a partial mediator. Acculturation preferences, in turn, influenced negative affect. The contact dimension underlying the categorical acculturation strategies was a predictor of outcomes, while the culture maintenance dimension was not. Implications of the findings are discussed.