Inaction Is Also Action: Attempting To Address Päkehä Paralysis
Inaction Is Also Action: Attempting To Address Päkehä Paralysis
复制标题
不作为也是行动:尝试解决白种人瘫痪问题
DOI:
10.34074/scop.4009008
复制
发表时间:
2020
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
J. Citizen
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
J. Citizen
As a Päkehä creative arts tutor and practice-led researcher working for the regional polytechnic Waikato Institute of Technology (Wintec), I have often been aware of what Tolich (2002) calls ‘Päkehä paralysis’ : the tendency by Päkehä not to engage with Mäori because it is ‘too hard’ due to an inability “to distinguish between their role in Mäori-centred research and their role in research in a New Zealand society, which involves Mäori among other ethnic groups.” (Tolich, 2002, p. 176). The default position is often one of avoidance, or worse, positioning Mäori within a ‘mainstream’ education framework that frequently makes universalist assumptions in a manner that has been called “whitestreaming” (Denis, 1997, as cited in Milne, 2013, p. 3). Intellectually being aware of these issues is, however, quite different to doing something about it as a Päkehä schooled and practising within the same liberal humanist traditions one is attempting to be critical of (Jones, 2017, p. 189). Some may even reasonably ask if it is possible to step outside of oneself, to escape an education system where one’s position and privilege is predicated by values that emphasise expertise as a foundation for authority. To really attempt partnership as a Päkehä working with Mäori, it is necessary to change oneself and to be open to the possibility of such changes. Such a process is, by necessity, uneasy, full of awkwardness and discomfort, as one realises that Päkehä foundational understandings of the world are not universal and cannot be taken for granted.