Using workplace thriving theory to investigate first‐year engineering students' abilities to thrive during the transition to online learning due to COVID ‐19
Using workplace thriving theory to investigate first‐year engineering students' abilities to thrive during the transition to online learning due to COVID ‐19
复制标题
利用工作场所蓬勃发展理论来调查一年级工科学生在因新冠肺炎 (COVID-19) 导致的向在线学习过渡期间的蓬勃发展能力
DOI:
10.1002/jee.20447
复制
发表时间:
2022
影响因子:
3.4
通讯作者:
Menold, Jessica
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Krishnakumar, Sandeep;Maier, Torsten;Berdanier, Catherine;Ritter, Sarah;McComb, Christopher;Menold, Jessica
BackgroundDuring the onset of the COVID‐19 crisis, universities rapidly pivoted to online formats and were often unable to adhere to the best practices of online learning highlighted in prior literature. It is well documented that a variety of barriers impeded “normal” educational practices.Purpose/HypothesisThe purpose of this paper is to investigate the perceptions of first‐year engineering students enrolled in an introductory engineering design course during the rapid transition to online working environments. We view students' perceptions through the theoretical lens of workplace thriving theory, a framework that allowed us to capture aspects of education required for students to thrive in non‐optimum learning settings.Design/MethodThis research employed semi‐structured interview methods with 13 students enrolled in an introductory engineering design course that relies on project‐based team learning. We analyzed interview transcripts using thematic analysis through an abductive approach and made interpretations through workplace thriving theory.ResultsResults indicated that students' abilities to thrive are related to four intersecting themes that demonstrate how workplace thriving theory manifests in this unanticipated online setting. These themes demonstrate elements that must be optimized for students to thrive in settings such as this: relationships with others, building and sharing knowledge through interactions, perceptions of experiential learning, and individual behaviors.ConclusionOur research, viewed through workplace thriving theory, highlights the mechanisms by which students tried to succeed in suboptimal environments. While not all our participants showed evidence of thriving, the factors required for thriving point to opportunities to harness these same factors in in‐person instruction environments.