Off-Ice Anaerobic Power Does Not Predict On-Ice Repeated Shift Performance in Hockey
Off-Ice Anaerobic Power Does Not Predict On-Ice Repeated Shift Performance in Hockey
复制标题
冰外无氧能力并不能预测曲棍球中的冰上重复换挡表现
DOI：
10.1519/jsc.0000000000001341
复制
发表时间：
2016
影响因子：
3.2
通讯作者：
E. Snyder
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
B. Peterson;J. Fitzgerald;Calvin C. Dietz;Kevin Ziegler;S. Baker;E. Snyder
摘要彼得森，BJ，菲茨杰拉德，JS，迪茨，CC，齐格勒，KS，贝克，SE和斯奈德，EM。冰上无氧功率不能预测冰上曲棍球的重复换档性能。J Strength Cond Res 30（9）：2375-2381，2016-无氧功率是团队运动员加速度和最高速度的重要预测因素。从历史上看，这些研究结果已被应用于冰球，尽管最近的研究使他们的有效性受到质疑。由于冰球强调重复产生力量的能力，因此应检查单回合无氧力量测试，以确定其预测冰上表现的能力。我们测试了传统的冰下无氧功率测试是否可以预测冰上加速度，最高速度和重复换档性能。45名曲棍球运动员，年龄在18-24岁之间，完成了人体测量，冰下和冰上测试。人体测量和冰下测试包括身高，体重，身体成分，垂直跳跃和温盖特测试。冰上测试包括加速度、最高速度和重复换档疲劳测试。垂直跳跃（VJ）（r =-0.42; r =-0.58）、温盖特相对峰值功率（WRPP）（r =-0.32; r =-0.43）和相对平均功率（WRMP）（r =-0.34; r =-0.48）分别与冰上加速度和最高速度显著相关（p <0.05）。相反，没有一个冰下试验与冰上重复换档性能相关，如通过第一门、第二门或总路线疲劳测量的VJ（r = 0.06; r = 0.13; r = 0.09）、WRPP（r = 0.06; r = 0.14; r = 0.10）或WRMP（r =-0.10; r =-0.01; r =-0.01）。虽然传统的离冰无氧功率测试预测单回合冰上加速度和最高速度，他们既不能预测球员的重复转移能力，也不是冰球表现的良好标志。
Abstract Peterson, BJ, Fitzgerald, JS, Dietz, CC, Ziegler, KS, Baker, SE, and Snyder, EM. Off-ice anaerobic power does not predict on-ice repeated shift performance in hockey. J Strength Cond Res 30(9): 2375–2381, 2016—Anaerobic power is a significant predictor of acceleration and top speed in team sport athletes. Historically, these findings have been applied to ice hockey although recent research has brought their validity for this sport into question. As ice hockey emphasizes the ability to repeatedly produce power, single bout anaerobic power tests should be examined to determine their ability to predict on-ice performance. We tested whether conventional off-ice anaerobic power tests could predict on-ice acceleration, top speed, and repeated shift performance. Forty-five hockey players, aged 18–24 years, completed anthropometric, off-ice, and on-ice tests. Anthropometric and off-ice testing included height, weight, body composition, vertical jump, and Wingate tests. On-ice testing consisted of acceleration, top speed, and repeated shift fatigue tests. Vertical jump (VJ) (r = −0.42; r = −0.58), Wingate relative peak power (WRPP) (r = −0.32; r = −0.43), and relative mean power (WRMP) (r = −0.34; r = −0.48) were significantly correlated (p ⩽ 0.05) to on-ice acceleration and top speed, respectively. Conversely, none of the off-ice tests correlated with on-ice repeated shift performance, as measured by first gate, second gate, or total course fatigue; VJ (r = 0.06; r = 0.13; r = 0.09), WRPP (r = 0.06; r = 0.14; r = 0.10), or WRMP (r = −0.10; r = −0.01; r = −0.01). Although conventional off-ice anaerobic power tests predict single bout on-ice acceleration and top speed, they neither predict the repeated shift ability of the player, nor are good markers for performance in ice hockey.