Obesity and its therapy: from genes to community action.
Obesity and its therapy: from genes to community action.
复制标题
肥胖及其治疗:从基因到社区行动。
DOI:
10.1016/j.pcl.2006.05.011
复制
发表时间:
2006
影响因子:
2.6
通讯作者:
Olivier,Michael
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Skelton,JosephA;DeMattia,Laure;Miller,Lawrence;Olivier,Michael
The increase in the number of overweight children over the last several decades is obvious to anyone who cares for or works with children. To the general practitioner, this is an especially frustrating problem. Few treatment modalities exist, and despite great knowledge of contributing factors, little can be accomplished in a brief office visit. Additionally, exciting advances in basic science research, beginning with the discovery of leptin in 1994 [1], have not led to novel tools for use in everyday clinical practice. Leptin turned out to be the tip of the iceberg in the scientific investigation of obesity and its comorbidities. To date, more than 600 genes, markers, and regions of chromosomes have been linked to obesity [2]. Does this mean we are closer or further away from finding better ways to treat and prevent obesity?Traditionally, the biopsychosocial model of obesity as a disease has been considered appropriate, as all elements of the model are relevant (Fig. 1). This model shows disease arising from the overlap of components. In applying this model to obesity research, biologic systems are viewed in isolation, not taking into account their interaction with the environment and behaviors until there is “disease” present. Although strides have been made exploring the pathophysiology of obesity, treatment and prevention have focused on the other two components: psychological and social. The best interventions have been in the fields of dietary management and behavioral change [3–5]. Drug therapy has been limited, especially in children [6–8]. Genetic testing is applicable to only a small number of those affected by obesity. Exploring the cellular and molecular mechanisms behind obesity while clinically treating from the other end of the spectrum can result in slow progress. By integrating basic science with clinical research, treatments and interventions will be better focused and more quickly translated into care plans. To facilitate this, a paradigm shift has taken place.