Post-exceptionalism in public policy: transforming food and agricultural policy
Post-exceptionalism in public policy: transforming food and agricultural policy
复制标题
DOI：
10.1080/13501763.2017.1334081
复制
发表时间：
2017-01-01
影响因子：
4.2
通讯作者：
Feindt, Peter H.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Daugbjerg, Carsten;Feindt, Peter H.
本文以《粮食和农业政策的转型》为题，引入了公共政策中的后例外主义概念。农业食品政策变化的分析作为一个生成的例子，概念化当前的转变，在民主福利国家的部门政策安排。这些安排的特点往往是一种例外主义的概念框架，通过条块分割、排他和以生产者为中心的政策和政治使某一部门的特殊待遇合法化。在决策国际化、政策领域之间的联系日益密切以及趋向于自我管制、自由化和注重业绩的政策的时代，政策例外论受到压力，要么转变，要么让位于（新）自由主义政策安排。后例外主义是指例外主义思想、制度、利益格局和政策工具的部分转变。它反映了当代政策领域的更复杂、更开放、更有争议和更多变的性质，但这些领域仍然保留着其政策遗产。讨论稳定性，作者区分互补和紧张后例外论。
Framing the special issue on the transformation of Food and Agricultural Policy, this article introduces the concept of post-exceptionalism in public policies. The analysis of change in agri-food policy serves as a generative example to conceptualize current transformations in sectoral policy arrangements in democratic welfare states. Often these arrangements have been characterized by an exceptionalist ideational framework that legitimizes a sector's special treatment through compartmentalized, exclusive and producer-centered policies and politics. In times of internationalization of policy-making, increasing interlinkage of policy areas and trends towards self-regulation, liberalization and performance-based policies, policy exceptionalism is under pressure to either transform or give way to (neo-)liberal policy arrangements. Post-exceptionalism denotes a partial transformation of exceptionalist ideas, institutions, interest constellations and policy instruments. It reflects the more complex, open, contested and fluid nature of contemporary policy fields that nevertheless still maintain their policy heritage. Discussing stability, the authors distinguish between complementary and tense post-exceptionalism.