Imitation in shadowing words
Imitation in shadowing words
复制标题
DOI：
10.3758/bf03194890
复制
发表时间：
2004-04-01
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Fowler, CA
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Shockley, K;Sabadini, L;Fowler, CA
使用Goldinger（1998）AXB范式评估阴影词的模仿。第一个实验是用不同的代币重复Goldinger的实验。实验1的AXB测试表明，阴影的话被认为是更好的模仿目标词比基线（阅读）的同行往往比机会（.50）。在AXB测试中基线和阴影词的呈现顺序也显着影响判断。先前接触的程度没有显着影响模仿的判断。实验2采用修改后的目标令牌延长语音起始时间（VOT）。除了AXB测试外，还在基线和阴影条件下比较了响应令牌的VOT。AXB测试显示，阴影的话是更好的模仿目标令牌比基线，没有AXB呈现顺序的影响。当VOT延长时，基线和阴影VOT之间的差异更大。自发模仿在非社会环境中的影响被认为是。
Imitation of shadowed words was evaluated using Goldinger's (1998) AXB paradigm. The first experiment was a replication of Goldinger's experiments with different tokens. Experiment 1's AXB tests showed that shadowed words were judged to be better imitations of target words than were baseline (read) counterparts more often than chance (.50). Order of presentation of baseline and shadowed words in the AXB test also significantly influenced judgments. Degree of prior exposure to token words did not significantly influence judgments of imitation. Experiment 2 employed modified target tokens with extended voice onset times (VOTs). In addition to AXB tests, VOTs of response tokens were compared across baseline and shadowing conditions. The AXB tests revealed shadowed words to be better imitations of target tokens than baseline, without an influence of AXB presentation order. Differences between baseline and shadowing VOTs were greater when VOTs were extended. The implications of spontaneous imitation in nonsocial settings are considered.