Inter-agency Information Sharing in Health and Social Care Services: The Role of Professional Culture
Inter-agency Information Sharing in Health and Social Care Services: The Role of Professional Culture
复制标题
健康和社会护理服务中的机构间信息共享：专业文化的作用
DOI：
10.1093/bjsw/bch257
复制
发表时间：
2005
影响因子：
1.8
通讯作者：
S. Asthana
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
S. Richardson;S. Asthana
苏·理查森现在是普利茅斯大学社会学、政治和法学院的一名研究生。苏已经在大学里对组织行为进行了超过25年的研究。作为普利茅斯大学的研究员，她在普利茅斯卫生行动区研究了伙伴关系，现在获得了经济及社会研究理事会的奖学金，调查卫生和社会护理伙伴关系中的信息共享问题。希娜·阿萨纳是普利茅斯大学卫生政策教授。她的研究兴趣之一是关注伙伴关系、工作和社区参与在卫生和社会排斥项目的规划和交付中的作用。她指导了一项研究，评估伙伴关系在广泛的当地项目中的作用，包括针对弱势儿童和年轻人、老年人、弱势社区和服务准入问题的项目。摘要这篇文章使用文献回顾来考察职业文化如何在健康和社会关怀的背景下塑造组织间的个人信息交换。其目的是探索可能的信息共享行为(“理想”、“过度开放”、“过度谨慎”和“混乱”)的简化模型，并表明信息共享的模式可能受到多种因素的影响。据建议，这些因素不仅包括在信息共享方面采取的方法的专业间差异，而且还包括专业之间相互联系的方式。
Sue Richardson is now a research student in the School of Sociology, Politics and Law, University of Plymouth. Sue has conducted university-based research into organizational behaviour for more than 25 years. Having researched partnership working in the Plymouth Health Action Zone as a research fellow with the University of Plymouth, she has now been awarded a studentship from the Economic and Social Research Council to investigate information-sharing issues in health and social care partnerships. Sheena Asthana is Professor of Health Policy at the University of Plymouth. Among her research interests is a focus on the role of partnership working and community involvement in the planning and delivery of health and social exclusion projects. She has directed research evaluating the role of partnership working in a wide range of local projects including those targeting vulnerable children and young people, older people, disadvantaged communities and service access problems. Summary This article uses a literature review to examine the ways in which professional culture might shape inter-organizational exchange of personal information in a health and social care context. The aim is to explore a simplified model of possible informationsharing behaviours (‘ideal’, ‘over-open’, ‘over-cautious’ and ‘chaotic’) and to suggest that patterns of information sharing may be influenced by a number of factors. It is proposed that these factors include not only inter-professional differences in the approach taken to information sharing but also the ways in which the professions interrelate.