Waterpipe tobacco products: nicotine labelling versus nicotine delivery.
Waterpipe tobacco products: nicotine labelling versus nicotine delivery.
复制标题
水烟烟草制品：尼古丁标签与尼古丁输送。
DOI：
10.1136/tc.2010.042416
复制
发表时间：
2012
期刊：
影响因子：
5.2
通讯作者：
Eissenberg,Thomas
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Vansickel,AndreaR;Shihadeh,Alan;Eissenberg,Thomas
BackgroundWaterbipe烟草包装标签通常表明“0.0%焦油”和“0.05%或0.5%尼古丁”. Objectives确定尼古丁标签与尼古丁delivery.Methods110水烟吸烟者从事45分钟的水烟吸烟会话的程度。测量抽吸地形和血浆尼古丁。使用了三种水烟品牌：Nakhla（0.5%尼古丁）、Starbuzz（0.05%尼古丁）和Al Fakher（0.05%尼古丁）。数据进行了单因素方差分析。结果地形没有不同品牌。不同品牌的血浆尼古丁峰值差异显著。铝Fakher有最高的尼古丁交付（11.4 ng/ml），其次是Nakhla（9.8 ng/ml）和Starbuzz（5.8 ng/ml）。ConclusionsNicotine标签上的水烟烟草产品并不反映交付;吸烟品牌与“0.05%尼古丁”标签导致更大的血浆尼古丁水平比吸烟品牌与“0.5%尼古丁”标签。水烟产品的标签应不误导消费者。
BackgroundWaterpipe tobacco package labelling typically indicates “0.0% tar” and “0.05% or 0.5% nicotine”.ObjectiveTo determine the extent to which nicotine labeling is related to nicotine delivery.Methods110 waterpipe smokers engaged in a 45-minute waterpipe smoking session. Puff topography and plasma nicotine were measured. Three waterpipe tobacco brands were used: Nakhla (0.5% nicotine), Starbuzz (0.05% nicotine), and Al Fakher (0.05% nicotine). Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA.ResultsTopography did not differ across brands. Peak plasma nicotine varied significantly across brands. Al Fakher had the highest nicotine delivery (11.4 ng/ml) followed by Nakhla (9.8 ng/ml) and Starbuzz (5.8 ng/ml).ConclusionsNicotine labelling on waterpipe tobacco products does not reflect delivery; smoking a brand with a “0.05% nicotine” label led to greater plasma nicotine levels than smoking a brand with a “0.5% nicotine” label. Waterpipe tobacco products should be labelled in a manner that does not mislead consumers.