"A Legitimate Place in the Profession": Author Reflections on the 2005 Disability Studies Special Issue.
"A Legitimate Place in the Profession": Author Reflections on the 2005 Disability Studies Special Issue.
复制标题
“职业中的合法地位”：作者对 2005 年残疾研究特刊的思考。
DOI：
10.5014/ajot.2021.045294
复制
发表时间：
2021
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
L. Mahaffey
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
A. Sheth;Jacqueline Kish;Laura VanPuymbrouck;Jenna L Heffron;Danbi Lee;L. Mahaffey
重要性
2005年，《美国职业治疗杂志》（American Journal of Occupational Therapy）出版了一期关于残疾研究的特刊。投稿作者要求读者反思他们的做法，并建议改变该领域的方法，但关于残疾研究融入职业治疗的现状的文献很少。
目的
让2005年特刊的原作者参与对残疾研究观点如何促进职业治疗变化的观点的审查，以及还有什么工作要做。
设计
研究小组对11位在特刊上发表文章的作者进行了半结构化采访。访谈记录采用主题分析法进行分析。使用编码器三角测量、多阶段数据分析和成员检查来建立可信度。
结果
数据中出现了五个主题：（1）接触残疾和残疾研究，（2）专刊对职业治疗的影响，（3）在专刊之外观察到的职业治疗变化，（4）将残疾研究纳入职业治疗的挑战，以及（5）残疾研究为职业治疗提供的建议。
结论和相关性
虽然最初的贡献作者承认残疾研究对他们自己的实践和学术的变革性影响，但结果表明，残疾研究仍然在主流职业治疗学术之外。探索残疾研究与职业科学等领域之间的联系和分歧，可以提高对残疾研究概念如何在理论和实践中定义和使用的理解。这篇文章补充说：自2005年第一期特刊出版以来，残疾研究领域继续影响着职业治疗，尽管更多的是以个体而不是系统的方式。需要开展工作，以接受残疾研究知情的关键和交叉基础的专业，并探讨如何使职业治疗可以更好地与人口通过残疾研究透镜的合作伙伴。
IMPORTANCE
In 2005, the American Journal of Occupational Therapy published a special issue focused on disability studies. Contributing authors challenged readers to reflect on their practices and recommended ways to change the field, yet literature on the current state of the integration of disability studies into occupational therapy is scarce.
OBJECTIVE
To engage the original authors of the 2005 special issue in an examination of perspectives on how disability studies perspectives have contributed to changes within occupational therapy and what work remains.
DESIGN
The research team conducted semistructured interviews with 11 authors who published an article in the special issue. Interview transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis. Triangulation of coders, multiple phases of data analysis, and member checking were used to establish trustworthiness.
RESULTS
Five themes emerged from the data: (1) exposure to disability and disability studies, (2) impact of the special issue on occupational therapy, (3) changes observed in occupational therapy beyond the special issue, (4) challenges integrating disability studies into occupational therapy, and (5) disability studies-informed recommendations for occupational therapy.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
Although the original contributing authors acknowledged the transformative impact of disability studies on their own practice and scholarship, the results suggest that disability studies remains outside mainstream occupational therapy scholarship. Exploring the connections and divergence between disability studies and fields such as occupational science could improve understanding of how disability studies concepts are defined and used in theory and practice. What This Article Adds: Since the publication of the original special issue in 2005, the field of disability studies has continued to influence occupational therapy, although more often in individual than in systemic ways. Work is needed to embrace a disability studies-informed critical and intersectional foundation for the profession and explore the ways in which occupational therapy can better partner with populations through a disability studies lens.
我认识并且（大部分）喜欢的治疗师。
DOI：
10.5014/ajot.59.5.580
发表时间：
2005
期刊：
The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association
影响因子：
--
作者：
Holzmueller,RobertaLPaikoff
通讯作者：
Holzmueller,RobertaLPaikoff