Summary-of-findings tables in Cochrane reviews improved understanding and rapid retrieval of key information
Summary-of-findings tables in Cochrane reviews improved understanding and rapid retrieval of key information
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.12.014
复制
发表时间：
2010-06-01
影响因子：
7.2
通讯作者：
Oxman, Andrew D.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Rosenbaum, Sarah E.;Glenton, Claire;Oxman, Andrew D.
目的：为了衡量用户满意度，理解和时间花费的结果摘要（SoF）表的影响，发现关键结果在科克伦review.Study设计和设置：我们随机参加循证实践研讨会（随机对照试验[RCT] I）和科克伦合作实体会议（RCT II），接受科克伦审查或没有SoF表。在RCT 1中，我们测量了用户满意度。在RCT II中，我们测量了正确的理解和花费的时间找到关键结果。结果：RCT I：与没有SoF表的参与者（n = 25）相比，使用SoF表的参与者（n = 47）更有可能“同意”或“强烈同意”重要结果的结果很容易找到-68% vs. 40%（P = 0.021）。RCT 11：有SoF表的参与者（n = 18）比没有SoF表的参与者（n = 15）更有可能正确回答两个关于结果的问题：93% vs. 44%（P = 0.003）和87% vs. 11%（P < 0.001）。与SoF表的参与者平均花了90秒，找到关键信息，而没有SoF表的参与者为4分钟（P = 0.002）。结论：在两个小型试验中，我们发现，包括一个SoF表的审查提高了理解和快速检索的关键结果相比，没有SoF表的审查。(C)2010年爱思唯尔公司All rights reserved.
Objective: To measure the effects of a summary-of-findings (SoF) table on user satisfaction, understanding, and time spent finding key results in a Cochrane review.Study Design and Setting: We randomized participants in an evidence-based practice workshop (randomized controlled trial [RCT] I) and a Cochrane Collaboration entities meeting (RCT II) to receive a Cochrane review with or without an SoF table. In RCT 1, we measured user satisfaction. In RCT II, we measured correct comprehension and time spent finding key results.Results: RCT I: Participants with the SoF table (n = 47) were more likely to "agree" or "strongly agree" that it was easy to find results for important outcomes than (n = 25) participants without the SoF table-68% vs. 40% (P = 0.021). RCT 11: Participants with the SoF table (n = 18) were more likely to correctly answer two questions regarding results than (n = 15) those without the SoF table: 93% vs. 44% (P = 0.003) and 87% vs. 11% (P < 0.001). Participants with the SoF table spent an average of 90 seconds to find key information compared with 4 minutes for participants without the SoF table (P = 0.002).Conclusion: In two small trials, we found that inclusion of an SoF table in a review improved understanding and rapid retrieval of key findings compared with reviews with no SoF table. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.