Experts sometimes show more false recall than novices: a cost of knowing too much
Experts sometimes show more false recall than novices: a cost of knowing too much
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/s1041-6080(03)00018-9
复制
发表时间：
2001-01-01
影响因子：
3.6
通讯作者：
Baird, RR
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Baird, RR
在投资领域有或没有专业知识的学生被测试回忆一组包含投资术语和其他与投资领域无关的术语的单词。与专家记忆文献、记忆错觉文献和内隐联想反应特征的预测一致，专家回忆了更多与投资相关的单词，矛盾的是，他们也在这个领域做了更多的错误回忆。这种结果模式与另一组专家和新手在两个领域的单词联想强度上的差异模式相似。(C) 2003爱思唯尔科学有限公司版权所有。
Students with or without expertise in the domain of investments were tested on recall of a list of words containing both investment terms and other terms not related to the domain of investment. Consistent with predictions derived from the expert memory literature, the memory illusion literature, and the ascribed characteristics of implicit associative responses, experts recalled more investment-related words and, paradoxically, also made more false recalls in that domain. This pattern of results paralleled the pattern of differences between another sample of experts and novices in strength of word associations in the two domains. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.