Mapping innate and adaptive immune function in arbovirus infections.
Mapping innate and adaptive immune function in arbovirus infections.
复制标题
绘制虫媒病毒感染中的先天和适应性免疫功能。
作者:
Altmann DM
One of the exciting things about the immunologist’s research landscape is that the clinical challenges pose such a rapidly moving target. The methodologies, paradigms, disease processes and even the pathogens that populate our research proposals and working lives today may often have been unknown to us a decade ago. This is patently evident for those interested in the immunology of emerging infectious diseases: changing patterns of human migration and travel, new zoonotic events and improved molecular diagnostics ensure that every few years we become aware of a new microbial threat on the radar. Among those that have attained increased prominence due to outbreaks in recent years are Ebola, SARS, MERS, Chikungunya and Zika viruses. The basic immunology of host defence against emerging pathogens has been a key area of focus at Immunology, as indicated by review articles in this issue and a number of other recent contributions.As immunologists we are familiar with the terms of engagement for host–viral interactions, and ready to deploy the toolkit to define the key immunogenic targets, the key roles of specific immune subsets and of antibody neutralization: high-throughput pathogen sequencing, recombinant antigens, epitope characterization, animal challenge and protection studies, recombinant viral vaccines. In silico predictive tools to transition from sequencing to candidate immunogens have come to play an important role in this process. 1 The pathway from newly described pathogen to trial of vaccine candidates has never felt so rapid. Nevertheless, each newly described infection cohort offers new challenges in unravelling the differential contributions of innate and adaptive mechanisms, all the more so for viruses that may induce pathology both directly and through the collateral damage of immunopathology.