9: Integrating Findings: The Meta-Analysis of Research
9: Integrating Findings: The Meta-Analysis of Research
复制标题
9:整合研究结果:研究的荟萃分析
DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
1977
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
G. Glass
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
G. Glass
Maccoby and Jacklin's (1974) review of research on the psychology of sex differences encompassed 1,600 works published before 1973. Considering the literature on that topic since 1973, and the fact that many other studies that are not focused specifically on sex differences may contain data on the question, a population of over 5,000 studies on sex differences can be imagined. There are dozens of educational problems on which the research literature is comprised of several hundred articles: ability grouping, reading instruction, programmed learning, instructional television, integration, and so on. Educational research and evaluation is a large and widely scattered enterprise. On problems of importance, it produces literally hundreds of studies in less than five years. The research techniques used, the measurements taken, the types of person studied—all may vary from one st;udy to the next, even though the topic is the same. The research enterprise in education and the social sciences is a rough-hewn, variegated undertaking of huge proportions. Determining what knowledge this enterprise has produced on some question is itself a genuinely important scholarly endeavor. The evolution of style of research integration has been shaped by the size of the research literature. In the 1940s and 1950s, a reviewer contributing to the Review of Educational Research or Psychological Bulletin might find one or two dozen studies on a topic. A narrative, rhetorical integration of so few studies was probably satisfactory. By the late 1960s, the research