Homogeneity tests of Tiebout sorting: A case study at the interface of city and suburb
Homogeneity tests of Tiebout sorting: A case study at the interface of city and suburb
复制标题
Tiebout排序的同质性检验：城市与郊区交界处的案例研究
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2016
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Lee Hachadoorian
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Lee Hachadoorian
蒂布特假说激发了50年来对居住地与地方税收和服务之间关系的研究。其中一条研究路线集中在社会经济同质性作为蒂布特排序的指标。我认为，社会经济变量的空间依赖性混淆尝试属性排序Tiebout过程。社会经济排序调查皇后区和拿骚县，纽约州，一个管辖统一的中心城市，其他管辖分散的郊区县。邻近人口普查区之间的社会经济差异在整个研究领域进行量化，并对代表通用地方政府和学区的变量进行回归。有强有力的证据表明，收入排序在小的郊区城市，而收入排序在学区的证据是模糊的。我的结论是，收入排序可能不像人们普遍认为的那样在学区一级重要，以前的研究可能错误地归因于家庭选择的政治规模。
The Tiebout hypothesis has stimulated 50 years of research into the relationship between residential location and local taxes and services. One line of research has focused on socioeconomic homogeneity as an indicator of Tiebout sorting. I argue that spatial dependence of socioeconomic variables confounds attempts to attribute sorting to Tiebout processes. Socioeconomic sorting is investigated in Queens and Nassau Counties, NY, one a jurisdictionally unified central city, the other a jurisdictionally fragmented suburban county. Socioeconomic differences between neighbouring census tracts are quantified throughout the study area and regressed on variables representing general purpose local governments and school districts. There is strong evidence of income sorting across small suburban municipalities, while the evidence of income sorting across school districts is ambiguous. I conclude that income sorting may not be as important at the school district level as generally believed, and previous research may have misattributed the political scale of household choice.