Socioeconomic Segregation of Activity Spaces in Urban Neighborhoods: Does Shared Residence Mean Shared Routines?

Socioeconomic Segregation of Activity Spaces in Urban Neighborhoods: Does Shared Residence Mean Shared Routines?
复制标题

DOI:
10.7758/rsf.2017.3.2.09
复制
发表时间:
2017-03
期刊:
The Russell Sage Foundation journal of the social sciences : RSF
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Boettner B
Boettner B
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Browning CR;Calder CA;Krivo LJ;Smith AL;Boettner B

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

收入和教育方面的居住隔离正在增加,而黑人-白人隔离正在缓慢下降。城市邻里居民非家庭活动空间的隔离问题尚未得到研究。住在同一个社区的人们的日常生活有多融合?与教育程度或收入相似的人相比,具有不同社会经济背景的人住在彼此附近的可能性更小吗?这些模式是否因社会经济连续体或邻里结构而异?这些分析利用了来自洛杉矶家庭和邻里调查的独特数据,这些数据确定了居民从事日常活动的地点。使用多层次p2(网络)模型,我们分析了位于同一街区的家庭对,并检查是否在同一地点进行日常活动的三个级别的SES的二分体组合,以及是否邻居的社会经济相似性在同一地点的日常活动是依赖于邻里社会经济不平等和信任的水平。结果表明,平均而言,增加SES减少了与任何SES组共享活动地点的可能性。这种模式在社会经济不平等程度高的社区最为明显。邻里信任解释了一个非平凡的比例的不平等的影响,日常活动排序的SES的程度。因此,鲜明的,明显的邻里水平的不平等,由SES可能会导致增强的不信任的影响,愿意跨类共享例程。
Residential segregation by income and education is increasing alongside slowly declining black-white segregation. Segregation in urban neighborhood residents’ non-home activity spaces has not been explored. How integrated are the daily routines of people who live in the same neighborhood? Are people with different socioeconomic backgrounds that live near one another less likely to share routine activity locations than those of similar education or income? Do these patterns vary across the socioeconomic continuum or by neighborhood structure? The analyses draw on unique data from the Los Angeles Family and Neighborhood Survey that identify the location where residents engage in routine activities. Using multilevel p2 (network) models, we analyze pairs of households located in the same neighborhood and examine whether the dyad combinations across three levels of SES conduct routine activities in the same location, and whether neighbor socioeconomic similarity in the co-location of routine activities is dependent on the level of neighborhood socioeconomic inequality and trust. Results indicate that, on average, increasing SES diminishes the likelihood of sharing activity locations with any SES group. This pattern is most pronounced in neighborhoods characterized by high levels of socioeconomic inequality. Neighborhood trust explains a nontrivial proportion of the inequality effect on the extent of routine activity sorting by SES. Thus stark, visible neighborhood-level inequality by SES may lead to enhanced effects of distrust on the willingness to share routines across class.